Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907721›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2020

Subtotal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation: clinical follow-up at median of 15 years.

V Patton, V Balakrishnan, C Pieri, P Doherty, K C Phan-Thien, D W King, D Z Lubowski

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Nonpharmacologic Treatment of Chronic Constipation.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V PattonDepartment Colorectal Surgery, St George Clinical School, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Sydney, 2217, Australia. v.patton@ecu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6721-0446
V BalakrishnanDepartment Colorectal Surgery, St George Clinical School, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Sydney, 2217, Australia.
C PieriDepartment Colorectal Surgery, St George Clinical School, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Sydney, 2217, Australia.
P DohertyDepartment Colorectal Surgery, St George Clinical School, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Sydney, 2217, Australia.
K C Phan-ThienDepartment Colorectal Surgery, St George Clinical School, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Sydney, 2217, Australia.
D W KingDepartment Colorectal Surgery, St George Clinical School, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Sydney, 2217, Australia.
D Z LubowskiDepartment Colorectal Surgery, St George Clinical School, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Sydney, 2217, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUEdith Cowan University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSlow transit constipation is characterised by prolonged colonic transit and reliance on laxatives. The pathophysiology is poorly understood and in its most severe form, total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is the final treatment option. We present a follow-up study of the long-term function in patients who had surgery for laxative-resistant slow transit constipation.

methodsA postal survey was sent to assess bowel frequency, abdominal pain, St Mark's continence score, satisfaction with procedure, likelihood to choose the procedure again, and long-term rates of small bowel obstruction and ileostomy. Longitudinal data from a subgroup studied 23 years previously are reported.

resultsForty-two patients (male = 2) were available for follow-up out of an initial cohort of 102. Mean time since surgery was 15.9 years (range 1.7-29.7) years. Fifty percent had < 4 bowel motions per day, most commonly Bristol stool 6, mean St Mark's score 7.45. Twenty-one percent had severe incontinence. Satisfaction and likelihood to choose surgery were high (median 10/10). There was a high rate of small bowel obstruction, suggesting pan-intestinal dysmotility in some cases. Conversion to ileostomy occurred in 8 patients. In the longitudinal follow-up in 15 subjects, continence deteriorated (p < 0.01), stool consistency softened (p < 0.01), and stool frequency fell (p < 0.01).

conclusionsSatisfactory stool frequency was achieved in the long term, and although 21% had incontinence scores > 12, patient satisfaction was high. This is the longest reported follow-up of colectomy for slow transit constipation, with longitudinal outcomes reported. There was considerable attrition of patients, so larger, longitudinal studies are required to better ascertain the functional outcomes of these patients.

Indexed as

ConstipationGastrointestinal TransitAnastomosis, SurgicalColectomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleRectumTreatment OutcomeColectomyLong-term outcomeSlow transit constipationSurgery

Identifiers

PMID31907721
OpenAlexW2998148051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.