Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907716›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2020

A multi-scanner study of MRI radiomics in uterine cervical cancer: prediction of in-field tumor control after definitive radiotherapy based on a machine learning method including peritumoral regions.

Akiyo Takada, Hajime Yokota, Miho Watanabe Nemoto, Takuro Horikoshi, Jun Matsushima, Takashi Uno

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Radiomics in cervical and endometrial cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akiyo TakadaDepartment of Radiology, Chiba University Hospital, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 260-8677, Japan.
Hajime YokotaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 260-8677, Japan. hjmykt@chiba-u.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2389-0299
Miho Watanabe NemotoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 260-8677, Japan.
Takuro HorikoshiDepartment of Radiology, Chiba University Hospital, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 260-8677, Japan.
Jun MatsushimaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Chiba University Hospital, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 260-8677, Japan.
Takashi UnoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 260-8677, Japan.
Chiba University · JPChiba University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to identify the most appropriate volume of interest (VOI) setting in prognostic prediction using pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic analysis for cervical cancer (CC) treated with definitive radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study participants were 87 patients who had undergone pretreatment MRI and definitive radiotherapy for CC. VOI

resultsVOI expansion improved AUC-ROCs compared with the predictive models of VOI

conclusionRecurrence could be predicted with high accuracy using expanded VOI for CC treated with definitive radiotherapy, suggesting that including the pathological characteristics of invasive margins in radiomics may improve predictive ability.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveCervix UteriFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical NeoplasmsIn-field recurrenceMachine learningPrognosisRadiomicsUterine cervical cancer

Identifiers

PMID31907716
OpenAlexW2997971570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.