Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907710›Full record

ReviewPituitary2020

Machine learning applications in imaging analysis for patients with pituitary tumors: a review of the current literature and future directions.

Ashirbani Saha, Samantha Tso, Jessica Rabski, Alireza Sadeghian, Michael D Cusimano

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Machine Learning in Pituitary Surgery.Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashirbani SahaDivision of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. ashirbani.saha@unityhealth.to.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7650-1720
Samantha TsoDivision of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jessica RabskiDivision of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alireza SadeghianDepartment of Computer Science, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.
Michael D CusimanoDivision of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research TBD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide an overview of fundamental concepts in machine learning (ML), review the literature on ML applications in imaging analysis of pituitary tumors for the last 10 years, and highlight the future directions on potential applications of ML for pituitary tumor patients.

methodWe presented an overview of the fundamental concepts in ML, its various stages used in healthcare, and highlighted the key components typically present in an imaging-based tumor analysis pipeline. A search was conducted across four databases (PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and Google Scholar) to gather research articles from the past 10 years (2009-2019) involving imaging related to pituitary tumor and ML. We grouped the studies by imaging modalities and analyzed the ML tasks in terms of the data inputs, reference standards, methodologies, and limitations.

resultsOf the 16 studies included in our analysis, 10 appeared in 2018-2019. Most of the studies utilized retrospective data and followed a semi-automatic ML pipeline. The studies included use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), facial photographs, surgical microscopic video, spectrometry, and spectroscopy imaging. The objectives of the studies covered 14 distinct applications and majority of the studies addressed a binary classification problem. Only five of the 11 MRI-based studies had an external validation or a holdout set to test the performance of a final trained model.

conclusionThrough our concise evaluation and comparison of the studies using the concepts presented, we highlight future directions so that potential ML applications using different imaging modalities can be developed to benefit the clinical care of pituitary tumor patients.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAnimalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPituitary NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesImage processingMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingMedical imagingPituitary adenomaPituitary tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.