ReviewPituitary2020
Machine learning applications in imaging analysis for patients with pituitary tumors: a review of the current literature and future directions.
Review in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of artificial intelligence and radiomics in pituitary neuroendocrine and sellar tumors: a quantitative and qualitative synthesis.Neuroradiology · 2022Pooled it
- A Verifiable Framework for Brain Tumor Classification: Combining Vision Transformers, Class-Weighted Learning, and SMT-Based Formal Decision Traces.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Radiomic study of common sellar region lesions differentiation in magnetic resonance imaging based on multi-classification machine learning model.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- The current state of MRI-based radiomics in pituitary adenoma: promising but challenging.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Current and Future Advances in Surgical Therapy for Pituitary Adenoma.Endocrine reviews · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Models to Forecast Outcomes of Pituitary Surgery: A Systematic Review in Quality of Reporting and Current Evidence.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- The "chameleon" sellar lesions: a case report of unexpected sellar lesions.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Historical and future trends in emergency pituitary referrals: a machine learning analysis.Pituitary · 2022Article
- Machine Learning for the Detection and Segmentation of Benign Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- Machine Learning in Pituitary Surgery.Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2022Review
- Deep Learning for Prediction of Progression and Recurrence in Nonfunctioning Pituitary Macroadenomas: Combination of Clinical and MRI Features.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The Application of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Pituitary Adenomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Deep Learning Technology in Pathological Image Analysis of Breast Tissue.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Radiomics Approach for Prediction of Recurrence in Non-Functioning Pituitary Macroadenomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo provide an overview of fundamental concepts in machine learning (ML), review the literature on ML applications in imaging analysis of pituitary tumors for the last 10 years, and highlight the future directions on potential applications of ML for pituitary tumor patients.
methodWe presented an overview of the fundamental concepts in ML, its various stages used in healthcare, and highlighted the key components typically present in an imaging-based tumor analysis pipeline. A search was conducted across four databases (PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and Google Scholar) to gather research articles from the past 10 years (2009-2019) involving imaging related to pituitary tumor and ML. We grouped the studies by imaging modalities and analyzed the ML tasks in terms of the data inputs, reference standards, methodologies, and limitations.
resultsOf the 16 studies included in our analysis, 10 appeared in 2018-2019. Most of the studies utilized retrospective data and followed a semi-automatic ML pipeline. The studies included use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), facial photographs, surgical microscopic video, spectrometry, and spectroscopy imaging. The objectives of the studies covered 14 distinct applications and majority of the studies addressed a binary classification problem. Only five of the 11 MRI-based studies had an external validation or a holdout set to test the performance of a final trained model.
conclusionThrough our concise evaluation and comparison of the studies using the concepts presented, we highlight future directions so that potential ML applications using different imaging modalities can be developed to benefit the clinical care of pituitary tumor patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31907710What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.