Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907558›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2020

Diagnostic utility of perilesional muscle edema in myositis ossificans.

Veronika Zubler, Malin Mühlemann, Reto Sutter, Tobias Götschi, Daniel A Müller, Tobias J Dietrich, Christian W Pfirrmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. An unusual clinical presentation of nontraumatic myositis ossificans: Leg length discrepancy.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Periarticular calcifications.Skeletal radiology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Easily misdiagnosed intramuscular hemangioma: a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Veronika ZublerFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. v.zubler@gmx.ch.
Malin MühlemannFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Reto SutterFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tobias GötschiUnit for Clinical and Applied Research, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel A MüllerFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tobias J DietrichFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian W PfirrmannFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHUniversitätsklinik Balgrist · CHETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the value of extensive perilesional muscle edema for the differentiation between myositis ossificans (MO) and malignant intramuscular soft tissue tumors on MRI. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo blinded readers analyzed MR examinations of 90 consecutive patients with intramuscular soft tissue masses (group 1: MO, n = 20; group 2: malignant tumors, n = 70). Extent of edema around lesions was graded (0, none; 1, minimal edema; 2, moderate edema; 3, extensive edema). Edema-lesion ratio (ELR = ratio of the maximal diameter of the edema and the maximal diameter of the central lesion) was calculated. ROC analysis, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kappa test were used.

resultsA total of 70% and 60% of patients with MO had edema grade 3 (reader 1/reader 2), 30%/40% edema grade 2. For the patients with malignant tumors, it was 2.9%/1.4% (edema grade 3) and 16%/23% (edema grade 2). Interrater reliability was substantial (kappa = 0.66). Extent of edema was significantly higher for patients of group 1 (p < 0.0001, both readers). Mean ELR was 3.60 (group 1) and 1.35 (group 2), with statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001). Grade 3 edema showed a sensitivity/specificity of 70%/97.1% (reader 1) and 60%/99% (reader 2) for diagnosing MO. For ELR > 2.0, sensitivity was 90% and specificity 91% for diagnosing MO.

conclusionsExtensive perilesional muscle edema on MRI of more than double the size of the central lesion is highly specific, but not pathognomonic for myositis ossificans in the early/intermediate stage in the differentiation to malignant intramuscular soft tissue lesions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildDiagnosis, DifferentialEdemaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMuscle NeoplasmsMyositis OssificansRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySoft Tissue NeoplasmsMagnetic resonance imagingMyositis ossificansPerilesional muscle edemaSoft tissue neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31907558
OpenAlexW2998573979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.