Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907386›Full record

ArticleJournal of human genetics2020

Impact of proactive high-throughput functional assay data on BRCA1 variant interpretation in 3684 patients with breast or ovarian cancer.

Hyun-Ki Kim, Eun Jin Lee, Young-Jae Lee, Jisun Kim, Yongsub Kim, Kyunggon Kim, Shin-Wha Lee, Suhwan Chang, Young Joo Lee, Jong Won Lee and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Performance ofHuman mutation · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyun-Ki KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3299-5298
Eun Jin LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea.
Young-Jae LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jisun KimDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yongsub KimDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9334-4333
Kyunggon KimDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Shin-Wha LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Suhwan ChangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Joo LeeDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong Won Lee *Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jjjongwr@hanmail.net.
Woochang Lee *Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. wlee1@amc.seoul.kr.
Sail ChunDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byung Ho SonDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Hae JungDepartment of Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Man KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won-Ki MinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sei-Hyun AhnDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ulsan College · KRHallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical utility of BRCA1/2 genotyping was recently extended from the selection of subjects at high risk for hereditary breast and ovary cancer to the identification of candidates for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment. This underscores the importance of accurate interpretation of BRCA1/2 genetic variants and of reducing the number of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). Two recent studies by Findlay et al. and Starita et al. introduced high-throughput functional assays, and proactively analyzed variants in specific regions regardless of whether they had been previously observed. We retrospectively reviewed all BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline genetic test reports from patients with breast or ovarian cancer examined at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between September 2011 and December 2018. Variants were assigned pathogenic or benign strong evidence codes according to the functional classification and were reclassified according to the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines. Among 3684 patients with available BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline genetic test reports, 429 unique variants (181 from BRCA1) were identified. Of 34 BRCA1 variants intersecting with the data reported by Findlay et al., three missense single-nucleotide variants from four patients (0.11%, 4/3684) were reclassified from VUSs to likely pathogenic variants. Four variants scored as functional were reclassified into benign or likely benign variants. Three variants that overlapped with the data reported by Starita et al. could not be reclassified. In conclusion, proactive high-throughput functional study data are useful for the reclassification of clinically observed VUSs. Integrating additional evidence, including functional assay results, may help reduce the number of VUSs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGenetic VariationGenotypeGerm-Line MutationHumansMiddle AgedMutation, MissenseOvarian NeoplasmsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID31907386
OpenAlexW2997111728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.