Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907209›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology research2020

pVACtools: A Computational Toolkit to Identify and Visualize Cancer Neoantigens.

Jasreet Hundal, Susanna Kiwala, Joshua McMichael, Christopher A Miller, Huiming Xia, Alexander T Wollam, Connor J Liu, Sidi Zhao, Yang-Yang Feng, Aaron P Graubert and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 205 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
205citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

205 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Antibody-drug conjugate engineering: from design to efficacy and safety.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Technical review of artificial intelligence in TCR-T therapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Automating neoantigen selection for personalized cancer vaccine design.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

145 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jasreet Hundal *McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-2584-5320
Susanna Kiwala *McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Joshua McMichaelMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Christopher A MillerMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Huiming XiaMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0003-2571-1880
Alexander T WollamMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Connor J LiuMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sidi ZhaoMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-8375-9279
Yang-Yang FengMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-6347-6749
Aaron P GraubertMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-5539-034X
Amber Z WollamMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Jonas NeichinMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Megan NeveauMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-4997-985X
Jason WalkerMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
William E GillandersSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Elaine R MardisInstitute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Obi L GriffithMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. mgriffit@wustl.edu obigriffith@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0843-4271
Malachi GriffithMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. mgriffit@wustl.edu obigriffith@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0843-4271

Funding

Standardized and Genome-Wide Clinical Interpretation of Complex Genotypes for Cancer Precision MedicineU24CA237719 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, OBI L. · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Genomic and Functional Identification of Chemotherapy Resistance Mechanisms in Small Cell Lung CancerU01CA231844 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GOVINDAN, RAMASWAMY, GRIFFITH, OBI L. · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
COMPREHENSIVE INFORMATIC ANALYSES OF AML GENOMES AND EPIGENOMESR50CA211782 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher A Miller · 2017 to 2026
$1.5M
DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATICS RESOURCES FOR INTERPRETATION OF CLINICALLY ACTIONABLE VARIANTS IN CANCERU01CA209936 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, OBI L. · 2016 to 2018
$1.0M
Integrated Analysis & Interpretation of Whole Genome Exome & Transcriptome SequenR00HG007940 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, MALACHI · 2017 to 2019
$724k
NCI NIH HHS R50 CA211782NCI NIH HHS U01 CA209936NCI NIH HHS U01 CA231844NCI NIH HHS U24 CA237719NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG007940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of neoantigens is a critical step in predicting response to checkpoint blockade therapy and design of personalized cancer vaccines. This is a cross-disciplinary challenge, involving genomics, proteomics, immunology, and computational approaches. We have built a computational framework called pVACtools that, when paired with a well-established genomics pipeline, produces an end-to-end solution for neoantigen characterization. pVACtools supports identification of altered peptides from different mechanisms, including point mutations, in-frame and frameshift insertions and deletions, and gene fusions. Prediction of peptide:MHC binding is accomplished by supporting an ensemble of MHC Class I and II binding algorithms within a framework designed to facilitate the incorporation of additional algorithms. Prioritization of predicted peptides occurs by integrating diverse data, including mutant allele expression, peptide binding affinities, and determination whether a mutation is clonal or subclonal. Interactive visualization via a Web interface allows clinical users to efficiently generate, review, and interpret results, selecting candidate peptides for individual patient vaccine designs. Additional modules support design choices needed for competing vaccine delivery approaches. One such module optimizes peptide ordering to minimize junctional epitopes in DNA vector vaccines. Downstream analysis commands for synthetic long peptide vaccines are available to assess candidates for factors that influence peptide synthesis. All of the aforementioned steps are executed via a modular workflow consisting of tools for neoantigen prediction from somatic alterations (pVACseq and pVACfuse), prioritization, and selection using a graphical Web-based interface (pVACviz), and design of DNA vector-based vaccines (pVACvector) and synthetic long peptide vaccines. pVACtools is available at http://www.pvactools.org.

Indexed as

Data MiningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsAntigens, NeoplasmArtificial IntelligenceCancer VaccinesComputational BiologyHumansImmunotherapyMutationNeoplasmsSoftwareAntigens, NeoplasmCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID31907209
PMCPMC7056579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.