Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907097›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2021

The causal effect of resilience on risk for drug abuse: a Swedish national instrumental variable, co-relative and propensity-score analysis.

Kenneth S Kendler, Henrik Ohlsson, Sean Clouston, Abigail A Fagan, Jan Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kenneth S KendlerVirginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-6570
Henrik OhlssonCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Sean CloustonDepartment of Family, Population, and Preventive Medicine, Program in Public Health, Stony Brook University Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Abigail A FaganDepartment of Sociology, Criminology & Law, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jan SundquistCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Kristina SundquistCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Shimane University · JPLund University · SEStony Brook University · USUniversity of Florida · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Genetic, Social, and Developmental Epidemiology of Drug Use DisordersR01DA030005 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KENNETH SEEDMAN KENDLER, JAN O SUNDQUIST · 2010 to 2026
$7.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought to quantify and investigate the causal nature of the association between resilience at age 18 and future drug abuse (DA).

methodIn a national sample of Swedish men (n = 1 392 800), followed for a mean of 30.3 years, resilience was assessed during military conscription and DA defined from medical, criminal and pharmacy registers. For causal inference, we utilized three methods: (i) instrumental variable analyses with the month of birth as the instrument; (ii) co-relative analyses using the general population, cousins, siblings and monozygotic twins; and (iii) propensity scoring on a subsample (n = 48 548) with strong resilience predictors. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to examine survival time till DA diagnosis.

resultsLow resilience was most robustly predicted from internalizing symptoms. Lower levels of standardized resilience strongly predicted the risk for DA (HR = 2.31, 95% CIs 2.28-2.33). In instrumental, co-relative, and propensity score analyses, the association between resilience and DA was estimated at HR = 3.06 (2.44-3.85), 1.34 (1.28-1.39), and 1.40 (1.28-1.53), respectively. Sensitivity analyses suggested that our instrument was weak and, despite our large sample, likely under-estimated confounding.

conclusionsLow resilience strongly predicts DA risk. Three different causal analysis methods, with divergent assumptions, concurred in estimating that an appreciable proportion of this association was causal, probably around 40%, with the remainder arising from confounding variables many of which are likely familial. Consistent with prior interventions focused on substance use prevention, our results suggest that prevention programs that increase resilience in adolescence should meaningfully reduce the long-term risk for DA.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultCausalityFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelPropensity ScoreRegistriesRisk FactorsSubstance-Related DisordersSwedenYoung AdultCausalitydrug abuseresilience

Identifiers

PMID31907097
PMCPMC7338227
OpenAlexW3000469365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.