Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907048›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2020

CACTUS: cancer image annotating, calibrating, testing, understanding and sharing in breast cancer histopathology.

Alper Aksac, Tansel Ozyer, Douglas J Demetrick, Reda Alhajj

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alper AksacUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Tansel OzyerTOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, Turkey.
Douglas J DemetrickLaboratory Medicine, University of Calgary and Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Reda AlhajjUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. alhajj@ucalgary.ca.
University of Calgary · CAIstanbul Medipol University · TRTOBB University of Economics and Technology · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDevelop CACTUS (cancer image annotating, calibrating, testing, understanding and sharing) as a novel web application for image archiving, annotation, grading, distribution, networking and evaluation. This helps pathologists to avoid unintended mistakes leading to quality assurance, teaching and evaluation in anatomical pathology. Effectiveness of the tool has been demonstrated by assessing pathologists performance in the grading of breast carcinoma and by comparing inter/intra-observer assessment of grading criteria amongst pathologists reviewing digital breast cancer images. Reproducibility has been assessed by inter-observer (kappa statistics) and intra-observer (intraclass correlation coefficient) concordance rates.

resultsCACTUS has been evaluated using a surgical pathology application-the assessment of breast cancer grade. We used CACTUS to present standardized images to four pathologists of differing experience. They were asked to evaluate all images to determine their assessment of Nottingham grade of a series of breast carcinoma cases. For each image, they were asked for their overall grade impression. CACTUS helps and guides pathologists to improve disease diagnosis with higher confidence and thereby reduces their workload and bias. CACTUS can be useful for both disseminating anatomical pathology images for teaching, as well as for evaluating agreement amongst pathologists or against a gold standard for evaluation or quality assurance.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareBreast NeoplasmsCalibrationDatabases as TopicFemaleHumansUser-Computer InterfaceAnnotationBreast cancerGradingHistopathologyMedical image analysis

Identifiers

PMID31907048
PMCPMC6945399
OpenAlexW2999944568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.