Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907034›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2020

Endometrial stromal cells exhibit a distinct phenotypic and immunomodulatory profile.

Suzanna Queckbörner, Elisabeth Syk Lundberg, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Lindsay C Davies

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Modelling Endometriosis Using In Vitro and In Vivo Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Association ofBiomedicines · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanna QueckbörnerDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, S-171 64, Solna, Sweden. suzanna.queckborner@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1996-6185
Elisabeth Syk LundbergDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, S-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristina Gemzell-DanielssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, S-171 64, Solna, Sweden.
Lindsay C DaviesDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, S-141 52, Huddinge, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Asherman's syndrome (AS), intrauterine scarring and fibrotic adhesions lead to menstrual disorders, pregnancy loss, or infertility. A few clinical trials have piloted cell therapy to overcome AS. Understanding the role of the stromal compartment in endometrial regeneration remains poorly understood. We hypothesize that endometrial stromal cells (eSCs) represent a relevant cell population to establish novel cell-based therapeutics for endometrial disorders. The aim of this study was to characterize eSCs and evaluate their immune-cell interactions.

methodseSCs were isolated from healthy donors, during the proliferative stage of the menstrual cycle. Cells were characterized for expression of mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) markers and assessed for their tumorigenic potential. eSCs were co-cultured with interferon γ and tumor necrosis factor α, and cell surface expression of their respective receptors and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) I and II determined by flow cytometry. Secreted levels of key immunomodulatory factors were established. eSCs were cultured with activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and T cell differentiation and proliferation determined.

resultseSCs demonstrated an MSC surface phenotype and exhibited multipotency. Expanded eSCs retained chromosomal stability and demonstrated no tumorigenicity. Upon stimulation, eSCs licensed to an anti-inflammatory phenotype with upregulated secretion of immunomodulatory factors. Stimulated eSCs did not express HLA class II. eSCs suppressed the proliferation and activation of CD4+ T cells, with the eSC secretome further downregulating central memory T cells and upregulating effector memory (EM) cells.

conclusionsDifferential responsiveness to inflammation by eSCs, compared to other MSC sources, demonstrates the need to understand the specific functional effects of individual stromal cell sources. A lack of HLA class II and triggering of EM T cell differentiation strongly links to innate in vivo roles of eSCs in tissue repair and immune tolerance during pregnancy. We conclude that eSCs may be an ideal cell therapy candidate for endometrial disorders.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImmunomodulationPhenotypeStromal CellsYoung AdultAsherman’s syndromeCell therapyEndometriumImmunomodulationInfertilityInflammationMesenchymal stromal cellStromaT cell

Identifiers

PMID31907034
PMCPMC6945659
OpenAlexW3003331854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.