Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31906948›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2020

In vivo/ex vivo efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in children: an open label randomized controlled trial in Burkina Faso.

Moussa Lingani, Léa Nadège Bonkian, Isidore Yerbanga, Adama Kazienga, Innocent Valéa, Hermann Sorgho, Jean Bosco Ouédraogo, Petronella Francisca Mens, Henk D F H Schallig, Raffaella Ravinetto and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00808951 (In Vivo and in Vitro Efficacy of the Recommended First Line Antimalarial Treatments), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00808951 phase4completednot on this map

In Vivo and in Vitro Efficacy of the Recommended First Line Antimalarial Treatments (Artemether-Lumefantrine and Amodiaquine-Artesunate) in Children With Uncomplicated Malaria in Burkina Faso

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre MurazRan2008 to 2011Enrolled440ConditionsMalariaArmsArtesunate-amodiaquine, Artemether-lumefantrine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Ex Vivo Drug Susceptibility ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Research Advances on Health Effects of EdibleFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Moussa LinganiInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Direction Régionale du Centre Ouest (IRSS/DRCO), Nanoro, Burkina Faso. lingani10@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5651-2035
Léa Nadège BonkianUnité de Recherche sur le Paludisme et Maladies Tropicales Négligées, Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Isidore YerbangaUnité de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro (URCN), Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Adama KaziengaUnité de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro (URCN), Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Innocent ValéaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Direction Régionale du Centre Ouest (IRSS/DRCO), Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Hermann SorghoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Direction Régionale du Centre Ouest (IRSS/DRCO), Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Jean Bosco OuédraogoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Direction Régionale du Centre Ouest (IRSS/DRCO), Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Petronella Francisca MensDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Experimental Parasitology Unit, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Academic Medical Centre at the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk D F H SchalligDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Experimental Parasitology Unit, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Academic Medical Centre at the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Raffaella RavinettoPublic Health Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Umberto d'AlessandroMedical Research Council Unit, The Gambia, Disease Control & Elimination Theme, Fajara, The Gambia.
Halidou TintoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Direction Régionale du Centre Ouest (IRSS/DRCO), Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFUniversity of Amsterdam · NLCentre Muraz · BFInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEMRC Unit the Gambia · GMUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

European Community'S Seventh Framework Programme () 201889Medical Research Council MC_UP_A900_1119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is recommended to improve malaria treatment efficacy and limit drug-resistant parasites selection in malaria endemic areas. 5 years after they were adopted, the efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ), the first-line treatments for uncomplicated malaria were assessed in Burkina Faso.

methodsIn total, 440 children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were randomized to receive either AL or ASAQ for 3 days and were followed up weekly for 42 days. Blood samples were collected to investigate the ex vivo susceptibility of P. falciparum isolates to lumefantrine, dihydroartemisinin (the active metabolite of artemisinin derivatives) and monodesethylamodiaquine (the active metabolite of amodiaquine). The modified isotopic micro test technique was used to determine the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values. Primary endpoints were the risks of treatment failure at days 42.

resultsOut of the 440 patients enrolled, 420 (95.5%) completed the 42 days follow up. The results showed a significantly higher PCR unadjusted cure rate in ASAQ arm (71.0%) than that in the AL arm (49.8%) on day 42, and this trend was similar after correction by PCR, with ASAQ performing better (98.1%) than AL (91.1%). Overall adverse events incidence was low and not significantly different between the two treatment arms. Ex vivo results showed that 6.4% P. falciparum isolates were resistant to monodesthylamodiaquine. The coupled in vivo/ex vivo analysis showed increased IC50 values for lumefantrine and monodesethylamodiaquine at day of recurrent parasitaemia compared to baseline values while for artesunate, IC50 values remained stable at baseline and after treatment failure (p > 0.05).

conclusionThese findings provide substantial evidence that AL and ASAQ are highly efficacious for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in children in Burkina Faso. However, the result of P. falciparum susceptibility to the partner drugs advocates the need to regularly replicate such surveillance studies. This would be particularly indicated when amodiaquine is associated in seasonal malaria chemoprophylaxis (SMC) mass drug administration in children under 5 years in Burkina Faso. Trial registration clinicaltrials, NCT00808951. Registered 05 December 2008,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00808951?cond=NCT00808951&rank=1.

Indexed as

AdolescentAmodiaquineAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsArtesunateBurkina FasoChildChild, PreschoolDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansInfantInhibitory Concentration 50LumefantrineAmodiaquineamodiaquine, artesunate drug combinationAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsArtesunatedesethylamodiaquineDrug CombinationsLumefantrineArtemisinin-based combination therapyBurkina FasoEfficacyIn vivo/ex vivoPaediatricSafetySub-Saharan AfricaUncomplicated malaria

Identifiers

PMID31906948
PMCPMC6945612
OpenAlexW3001008900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.