Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31906892›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

A cross sectional study to determine the prevalence of cough and its impact in patients with lung cancer: a patient unmet need.

Amélie Harle, Alex Molassiotis, Oliver Buffin, Jack Burnham, Jaclyn Smith, Janelle Yorke, Fiona H Blackhall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of TRPA1 in lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Efficacy of gefapixant, a P2XThe Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amélie HarleDorset Cancer Centre, Poole NHS Foundation Trust, Longfleet Road, Poole, BH15 2LB, UK. Amelie.Harle@poole.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7743-9626
Alex MolassiotisSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Oliver BuffinSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jack BurnhamSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jaclyn SmithDivision of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Janelle YorkeSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Fiona H BlackhallDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKPoole Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29420Department of Health DRF-2010-03-55Wellcome Trust 207504/B/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is absence of literature related to cough prevalence and its characteristics in lung cancer patients, with information deriving only from broader symptoms occurrence studies. The aims of this study were to provide a snapshot of the prevalence of all-cause-cough in lung cancer patients and to characterise cough in terms of its impact and severity.

methodsA cross-sectional study recruiting consecutive lung cancer patients over a pre-defined period of time and using cough-specific validated tools in a tertiary referral centre in the UK, including a cough severity VAS and the Manchester Cough in Lung Cancer scale (MCLCS).

resultsData was collected from 202 patients. All-cause cough prevalence was 57% (through VAS) both in the screened (N = 223) and research (N = 202) population or 67% (through the MCLCS), and cough severity was moderate at a mean of 32 mm (in a 100 mm VAS). Age, sex, smoking status, lung cancer histology, stage and comorbidities were not associated with cough prevalence. The only variable associated with lower cough reports was being 'on anticancer treatment'; fewer patients on treatment reported a cough (40%) compared to those off treatment (54%) (p = 0.04). The impact of cough (as measured by MCLCS) was also significant (mean score = 22). About 18% of patients felt moderate/severe distress from their cough and about 15% often or always reported disturbed sleep due to coughing. Half the patients felt their cough warranted treatment.

conclusionsCough is a common symptom in lung cancer with considerable impact on patients' lives. Cough presence and severity should regularly be assessed in clinical practice. There is an urgent need to focus on developing more potent antitussive treatments and improve the management of this complex and distressing symptom.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungComorbidityCoughCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexCoughImpactLung cancerPrevalenceQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID31906892
PMCPMC6943945
OpenAlexW3000501641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.