ArticleBMC nephrology2020
Impact of the donor-recipient gender matching on the graft survival from live donors.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- How good is a living donor? Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of donor demographics on post kidney transplant outcomes.Journal of nephrology · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of sex on clinical outcomes according to immunologic risk in spousal donor kidney transplantation.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2026Article
- Trends and outcomes in kidney retransplantation: a 2-decade longitudinal analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- The Impact of Living Kidney Donor Glomerular Filtration Rate on Graft Survival.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- The Individual Impact of Machine Perfusion on Liver and Kidney on Donor Expansion in Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025Article
- Using Unsupervised Clustering to Characterize Phenotypes Among Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Cohort Study.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2025Article
- Analysis of IL-17A, IL-17F, and miR-146a-5p Prior to Transplantation and Their Role in Kidney Transplant Recipients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- A narrative review on adverse drug reactions of COVID-19 treatments on the kidney.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024Review
- Prognostic factors for lung transplant recipients focusing on age and gender: the Japanese lung transplantation report 2022.Surgery today · 2023Article
- Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Serum Level in Patients Vaccinated With Sinopharm/BBIBP-CorV With Kidney Transplantation.Transplantation proceedings · 2022Article
- The Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator, Raloxifene, Is Protective Against Renal Ischemia-reperfusion Injury.Transplantation · 2022Article
- MicroRNA-339-5p inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced rat mesangial cells by regulating the Syk/Ras/c-Fos pathway.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2022Article
- Nondirected Living Kidney Donation and Recipient Outcomes in the United States: A 20-Year Review.Kidney international reports · 2022Article
- Kidney glomerular filtration rate plasticity after transplantation.Clinical kidney journal · 2022Article
- Risk Factors of Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Preoperative CD52 Level Predicts Graft Survival following Kidney Transplantation.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- The Impact of Recipient Demographics on Outcomes from Living Donor Kidneys: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Correction to: Impact of the donor-recipient gender matching on the graft survival from live donors.BMC nephrology · 2020Article
- Precision transplant pathology.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2020Review
- Impact of Kidney Donation on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis.Indian journal of nephrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral factors such as recipient age, BMI, serum cratinine, and positive history of dialysis are important in predicting graft survival among kidney transplant recipients. One factor affecting the transplant outcomes is donors and recipients gender, which is usually ignored.
methodsA total of 1113 kidney transplant recipients were studied in this retrospective cohort study. Several factors were taken into account for graft survival and outcomes such as donors and recipients gender and age in addition to common recipient factors like cratinine, eGFR, BMI, and positive history of dialysis.
resultsThe most successful transplant based on donor-recipient gender was observed in male donor to male recipient, and then male donor to female recipient. In female transplant recipients, level of serum cratinine and eGFR, positive dialysis history before transplant, and low donor hemoglobin level can be considered as good prognostic factors recommended for kidney transplant survival.
conclusionsOur results suggested gender matching for kidney transplant. Only in some exceptional conditions, male donor to female recipient kidney transplant may be successful and female donors to male recipients are not suggested, especially in aged patients with the history of dialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.