Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31906859›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

A comprehensive epigenomic analysis of phenotypically distinguishable, genetically identical female and male Daphnia pulex.

Jouni Kvist, Camila Gonçalves Athanàsio, Michael E Pfrender, James B Brown, John K Colbourne, Leda Mirbahai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jouni KvistResearch Program for Molecular Neurology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Jouni.Kvist@helsinki.fi.
Camila Gonçalves AthanàsioDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Michael E PfrenderDepartment of Biological Sciences and Environmental Change Initiative, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, USA.
James B BrownEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA.
John K ColbourneSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Leda MirbahaiWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. Leda.Mirbahai@warwick.ac.uk.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USMcGill University · CAUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Notre Dame · USUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDaphnia species reproduce by cyclic parthenogenesis involving both sexual and asexual reproduction. The sex of the offspring is environmentally determined and mediated via endocrine signalling by the mother. Interestingly, male and female Daphnia can be genetically identical, yet display large differences in behaviour, morphology, lifespan and metabolic activity. Our goal was to integrate multiple omics datasets, including gene expression, splicing, histone modification and DNA methylation data generated from genetically identical female and male Daphnia pulex under controlled laboratory settings with the aim of achieving a better understanding of the underlying epigenetic factors that may contribute to the phenotypic differences observed between the two genders.

resultsIn this study we demonstrate that gene expression level is positively correlated with increased DNA methylation, and histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 4 (H3K4me3) at predicted promoter regions. Conversely, elevated histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 27 (H3K27me3), distributed across the entire transcript length, is negatively correlated with gene expression level. Interestingly, male Daphnia are dominated with epigenetic modifications that globally promote elevated gene expression, while female Daphnia are dominated with epigenetic modifications that reduce gene expression globally. For examples, CpG methylation (positively correlated with gene expression level) is significantly higher in almost all differentially methylated sites in male compared to female Daphnia. Furthermore, H3K4me3 modifications are higher in male compared to female Daphnia in more than 3/4 of the differentially regulated promoters. On the other hand, H3K27me3 is higher in female compared to male Daphnia in more than 5/6 of differentially modified sites. However, both sexes demonstrate roughly equal number of genes that are up-regulated in one gender compared to the other sex. Since, gene expression analyses typically assume that most genes are expressed at equal level among samples and different conditions, and thus cannot detect global changes affecting most genes.

conclusionsThe epigenetic differences between male and female in Daphnia pulex are vast and dominated by changes that promote elevated gene expression in male Daphnia. Furthermore, the differences observed in both gene expression changes and epigenetic modifications between the genders relate to pathways that are physiologically relevant to the observed phenotypic differences.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticAnimalsDaphniaEpigenomicsFemaleGene ExpressionHistonesLysineMaleMethylationPhenotypePromoter Regions, GeneticSex FactorsHistonesLysineEpigeneticsEvolutionGene expressionNon-conventional model organisms

Identifiers

PMID31906859
PMCPMC6945601
OpenAlexW3004204579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.