ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic targets2020
Therapeutic targets for liver regeneration after acute severe injury: a preclinical overview.
Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of serum alpha-fetoprotein kinetics in liver failure on artificial liver support.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Feedback Loops Shape Oxidative and Immune Interactions in Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- G-CSF promotes the viability and angiogenesis of injured liver via direct effects on the liver cells.Molecular biology reports · 2022Article
- Liver ischaemia-reperfusion injury: a new understanding of the role of innate immunity.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Review
- Grand Challenges in Organ Transplantation.Frontiers in transplantation · 2022Article
- A comprehensive investigation on liver regeneration: a meta-analysis and systems biology approach.Clinical and experimental hepatology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.