Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31906294›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Various Endoscopic Techniques for Treatment of Consequences of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Practical Updates for the Endoscopist.

Mateusz Jagielski, Marian Smoczyński, Jacek Szeliga, Krystian Adrych, Marek Jackowski

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06134024 (The Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Double Pigtail Plastic Stents During Endoscopic Transmural Drainage of Post-inflammatory Pancreatic and Peripancreatic Fluid Collections With Use of Lumen-apposing Metal Stents), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06134024 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Double Pigtail Plastic Stents During Endoscopic Transmural Drainage of Post-inflammatory Pancreatic and Peripancreatic Fluid Collections With Use of Lumen-apposing Metal Stents (LAMS).

TypeinterventionalSponsorNicolaus Copernicus UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsPancreatitis, Acute, Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing, Pancreatic Pseudocyst, Pancreatic NecrosisArmsIntroduction of double pigtail plastic stents through the LAMS during endoscopic transmural drainage of post-inflammatory pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections, Endoscopic transmural drainage of post-inflammatory pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections with use of LAMS only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of severe acute pancreatitis. Evidence based medicine (EBM) clinical practice guidelines.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  5. Turkish Society of Gastroenterology: Pancreas Working Group, Acute Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Endoscopic treatment of pancreaticopleural fistulas.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mateusz JagielskiDepartment of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.
Marian SmoczyńskiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.
Jacek SzeligaDepartment of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.
Krystian AdrychDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.
Marek JackowskiDepartment of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PLGdańsk Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite great progress in acute pancreatitis (AP) treatment over the last 30 years, treatment of the consequences of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) remains controversial. While numerous reports on minimally invasive treatment of the consequences of ANP have been published, several aspects of interventional treatment, particularly endoscopy, are still unclear. In this article, we attempt to discuss these aspects and summarize the current knowledge on endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis. Endotherapy has been shown to be a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment modality in patients with consequences of ANP. The evolution of endoscopic techniques has made endoscopic drainage more effective and reduced the use of other minimally invasive therapies for pancreatic necrosis.

Indexed as

acute necrotizing pancreatitisendotherapyminimally invasivepancreatic necrosistherapeutic endoscopytherapeutic EUS

Identifiers

PMID31906294
PMCPMC7019492
OpenAlexW2998202674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.