Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31906118›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

A Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Cattle Slaughterhouse Wastewater Using Conventional and Modified Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) Reactors.

Mohammed Ali Musa, Syazwani Idrus, Mohd Razif Harun, Tuan Farhana Tuan Mohd Marzuki, Abdul Malek Abdul Wahab

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammed Ali MusaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia.
Syazwani IdrusDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia.
Mohd Razif HarunDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia.
Tuan Farhana Tuan Mohd MarzukiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia.
Abdul Malek Abdul WahabFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cattle slaughterhouses generate wastewater that is rich in organic contaminant and nutrients, which is considered as high strength wastewater with a high potential for energy recovery. Work was undertaken to evaluate the efficiency of the 12 L laboratory scale conventional and a modified upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors (conventional, R1 and modified, R2), for treatment of cattle slaughterhouse wastewater (CSWW) under mesophilic condition (35 ± 1 °C). Both reactors were acclimated with synthetic wastewater for 30 days, then continuous study with real CSWW proceeds. The reactors were subjected to the same loading condition of OLR, starting from 1.75, 3, 5 10, 14, and 16 g L

Indexed as

AbattoirsBiofuelsBioreactorsWastewaterAnaerobiosisAnimalsBiomassCattleWaste Disposal, FluidWaste ManagementBiofuelsWastewateranaerobic digestioncattle slaughterhouse wastewaterCODHRTOLRUASB reactors

Identifiers

PMID31906118
PMCPMC6982031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.