ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019
Retrospective Efficacy Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Before-treatment body mass index as a prognostic factor in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Advancing immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge: key insights into efficacy, safety, and personalized strategies in advanced solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients following immune-related adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Rechallenge With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Solid Tumor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge in advanced solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Pretreatment body mass index and clinical outcomes in cancer patients following immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2020Pooled it
- Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Prognostic Impact of Body Mass index in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Long-term follow-up of a phase 1/2 trial of anti-GDF-15 antibody visugromab plus anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab in anti-PD-1/-L1 relapsed/refractory solid tumors.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.BMC immunology · 2024Trial
- Rechallenge with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Liver cancer · 2026Review
- Effectiveness and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitor Rechallenge After Prior Immunotherapy in Patients Aged ≥ 60 Years with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
- The efficacy analysis of immunotherapy rechallenge after progression from first-line chemo-immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.BMC immunology · 2026Article
- Real-World Outcomes and Safety of PD-1 Blockade Rechallenge Strategies After Prior Immunotherapy in Advanced NSCLC: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Rechallenge with immune-checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced-stage lung cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- A multicenter, prospective, observational study of nivolumab readministration for advanced gastric cancer (NIVO RETURNS).Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Feasibility and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades as rechallenge immunotherapy in previously treated advanced ESCC: a retrospective study.The oncologist · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Little is known regarding the effectiveness and tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge after disease progression following initial ICI treatments. To identify eligible patients for ICI rechallenge, we retrospectively analyzed the relationship between clinical profiles and the effect of ICI rechallenge in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We enrolled 35 NSCLC patients at six different institutions who were retreated with ICIs after discontinued initial ICI treatments due to disease progression. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of clinical profiles on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Median PFS and OS were 81 d (95% confidence interval, CI, 41-112 d) and 225 d (95% CI 106-361 d), respectively. The objective response rate was 2.9%, and the disease control rate was 42.9%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG-PS) ≥ 2 (hazard ratio, HR, 2.38; 95% CI 1.03-5.52;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.