Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31906026›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Evaluation of Bioaerosol Bacterial Components of a Wastewater Treatment Plant Through an Integrate Approach and In Vivo Assessment.

Erika Bruni, Giulia Simonetti, Beatrice Bovone, Chiara Casagrande, Federica Castellani, Carmela Riccardi, Donatella Pomata, Patrizia Di Filippo, Ermanno Federici, Francesca Buiarelli and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erika BruniDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology "C. Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Giulia SimonettiDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Beatrice BovoneDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology "C. Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Chiara CasagrandeDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.
Federica CastellaniDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Carmela RiccardiDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Donatella PomataDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Patrizia Di FilippoDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1929-1691
Ermanno FedericiDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4983-1967
Francesca BuiarelliDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5104-8854
Daniela UccellettiDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology "C. Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6841-8129
Sapienza University of Rome · ITIstituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater carries different pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms that can be dispersed in the surrounding environment. Workers who frequent sewage treatment plants can therefore be exposed to aerosols that contain a high concentration of potentially dangerous biological agents, or they can come into direct contact with contaminated material. This can lead to allergies, infections and occupational health-associated diseases. A characterization of biological risk assessment of bioaerosol exposure is necessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of an interdisciplinary method that combines chemical and biological approaches for the analysis of a bioaerosol derived from a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) situated in Italy. Sampled filters were analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS spectroscopy that searched for different chemical biomarkers of airborne microorganisms. The analytical quantification was compared to the biological cultural method that revealed an underrated microbial concentration. Furthermore, next generation sequencing analysis was used also to identify the uncultivable species that were not detected by the culture dependent-method. Moreover, the simple animal model

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyChromatography, LiquidWaste Disposal FacilitiesAerosolsBacteriaHumansItalyOccupational ExposureRisk AssessmentTandem Mass SpectrometryWastewaterWorkplaceAerosolsWastewaterairbornebacterial bioaerosolCaenorhabditis eleganswastewaterworker exposure

Identifiers

PMID31906026
PMCPMC6981557
OpenAlexW2998240697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.