Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31905751›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Should We Scale-Up? A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of an Intervention Targeting Sedentary Office Workers Using the RE-AIM QuEST Framework.

Bradley MacDonald, Ann-Marie Gibson, Xanne Janssen, Jasmin Hutchinson, Samuel Headley, Tracey Matthews, Alison Kirk

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bradley MacDonaldSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond Street, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK.
Ann-Marie GibsonSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond Street, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK.
Xanne JanssenSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond Street, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1355-0792
Jasmin HutchinsonDepartment of Exercise Science and Athletic Training, Springfield College, 263 Alden Street, Springfield, MA 01109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5813-0789
Samuel HeadleyDepartment of Exercise Science and Athletic Training, Springfield College, 263 Alden Street, Springfield, MA 01109, USA.
Tracey MatthewsSchool of Physical Education, Performance and Sport Leadership, Springfield College, 263 Alden Street, Springfield, MA 01109, USA.
Alison KirkSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond Street, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicSedentary BehaviorSitting PositionAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedOccupational HealthWorkplaceoffice workersprocess evaluationRE-AIMscale-upsedentarysittingworkplace health

Identifiers

PMID31905751
PMCPMC6981814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.