ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019
Invasive Evaluation of the Microvasculature in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Coronary Flow Reserve versus the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Predictive value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for new-onset atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
- Relationship between preoperative hemoglobin A1c and late postoperative coronary flow reserve improvement after coronary artery bypass grafting.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Index of microcirculatory resistance: state-of-the-art and potential applications in computational simulation of coronary artery disease.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2022Article
- Index of microcirculatory resistance predicts long term cardiac systolic function in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Determining the Significance of Coronary Plaque Lesions: Physiological Stenosis Severity and Plaque Characteristics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Invasive Assessment of the Myocardial Microcirculation during Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Combined diagnostic value of the systemic immune-inflammation index and LDL for coronary microvascular disease: a retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseaseArticle
- Association Between Thrombogenicity Indices and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.JACC. Basic to translational scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most common causes of death in both the developed and developing world. It has high associated morbidity despite prompt institution of recommended therapy. The focus over the last few decades in ST-segment elevation AMI has been on timely reperfusion of the epicardial vessel. However, microvascular consequences after reperfusion, such as microvascular obstruction (MVO), are equally reliable predictors of outcome. The attention on the microcirculation has meant that traditional angiographic/anatomic methods are insufficient. We searched PubMed and the Cochrane database for English-language studies published between January 2000 and November 2019 that investigated the use of invasive physiologic tools in AMI. Based on these results, we provide a comprehensive review regarding the role for the invasive evaluation of the microcirculation in AMI, with specific emphasis on coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.