Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31905731›Full record

ArticleViruses2019

A Comprehensive Strategy for Screening for Xenotransplantation-Relevant Viruses in a Second Isolated Population of Göttingen Minipigs.

Luise Krüger, Yannick Kristiansen, Emelie Reuber, Lars Möller, Michael Laue, Christian Reimer, Joachim Denner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luise KrügerRobert Koch Institute, HIV and Other Retroviruses, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Yannick KristiansenRobert Koch Institute, HIV and Other Retroviruses, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Emelie ReuberRobert Koch Institute, HIV and Other Retroviruses, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Lars MöllerRobert Koch Institute, Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens ZBS 4: Advanced Light and Electron Microscopy, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Michael LaueRobert Koch Institute, Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens ZBS 4: Advanced Light and Electron Microscopy, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Christian ReimerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Goettingen, Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Joachim DennerRobert Koch Institute, Robert Koch Fellow, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3244-6085
Robert Koch Institute · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenotransplantation using pig tissues and organs is under development in order to alleviate the increasing shortage of human transplants. Since xenotransplantation may be associated with the transmission of porcine microorganisms to the human recipient, the donor pigs should be carefully analyzed, especially for the presence of potentially zoonotic viruses. Göttingen Minipigs (GöMP) are potential donors of islet cells for the treatment of diabetes. Despite the fact that all animals produced at Ellegaard Göttingen Minipigs A/S carry porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) in their genome and that very few animals were infected with porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV), hepatitis E virus (HEV) and porcine lymphotropic herpesvirus (PLHV), no transmission of these viruses was observed in a preclinical trial transplanting GöMP islet cells into cynomolgus monkeys. Using a new comprehensive strategy, we then analyzed an isolated subpopulation of Göttingen Minipigs which remained at the University of Göttingen. We concentrated on 11 xenotransplantation-relevant viruses and combined co-incubation assays with susceptible human target cells and molecular biological methods to evaluate the risk posed by PERV. All animals in Göttingen carry PERV-A, PERV-B, and PERV-C in their genome but they are not infected with PCMV, PLHV and HEV. The difference may be explained by selection of negative animals and/or de novo infection. The PERV copy number was established using ddPCR (93 copies) and a human-tropic PERV-A/C was found released from PBMCs of one animal with a high expression of PERV-C.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralAnimalsEndogenous RetrovirusesFemaleGene DosageHEK293 CellsHeterograftsHumansMaleSwineSwine DiseasesSwine, MiniatureTransplantation, Heterologoushepatitis E virus (HEV)porcine circovirus (PCV)porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV)porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV)porcine lymphotropic herpesvirus (PLHV)porcine virusesxenotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID31905731
PMCPMC7019624
OpenAlexW2998532899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.