Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31905609›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Shana V Stoddard, Kyra Dodson, Kamesha Adams, Davita L Watkins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shana V StoddardDepartment of Chemistry, Natural Sciences Division, Rhodes College, 2000 North Parkway, Memphis, TN 38112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0721-084X
Kyra DodsonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, College of Libera Arts, University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848, Oxford, MS 38677, USA.
Kamesha AdamsDepartment of Chemistry, Division of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, LeMoyne-Owen College, 807 Walker Avenue, Memphis, TN 38126, USA.
Davita L WatkinsDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, College of Libera Arts, University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848, Oxford, MS 38677, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0943-7220
University of Mississippi · USRhodes College · USWalker (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone deacetylases (HDAC) are being targeted for a number of diseases such as cancer, inflammatory disease, and neurological disorders. Within this family of 18 isozymes, HDAC4 is a prime target for glioma, one of the most aggressive brain tumors reported. Thus, the development of HDAC4 inhibitors could present a novel therapeutic route for glioma. In this work, molecular docking studies on cyclopropane hydroxamic acid derivatives identified five novel molecular interactions to the HDAC4 receptor that could be harnessed to enhance inhibitor binding. Thus, design guidelines for the optimization of potent HDAC4 inhibitors were developed which can be utilized to further the development of HDAC4 inhibitors. Using the developed guidelines, eleven novel cyclopropane hydroxamic acid derivatives were designed that outcompeted all original cyclopropane hydroxamic acids HDAC4 inhibitors studied

Indexed as

Drug DesignBinding SitesHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHumansMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsHDAC4 protein, humanHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesRepressor ProteinsgliomaHDACHDAC4inhibitor designmolecular dockingmolecular interactions

Identifiers

PMID31905609
PMCPMC6981887
OpenAlexW2996840115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.