Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31905545›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2020

Child feces management practices and fecal contamination: A cross-sectional study in rural Odisha, India.

Valerie Bauza, Fiona Majorin, Parimita Routray, Gloria D Sclar, Bethany A Caruso, Thomas Clasen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Antimicrobial-resistantmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PersistentEnvironmental science & technology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Formative Research to Design a Child-Friendly Latrine in Bangladesh.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. No Child's Play: Under-five Child Feces Management in a Rural Area of Bengaluru Urban District, India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Valerie BauzaDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America. Electronic address: valerie.bauza@emory.edu.
Fiona MajorinLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Parimita RoutrayIndependent Consultant, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Gloria D SclarDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Bethany A CarusoDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Thomas ClasenDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Emory University · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Graduate and Postdoctoral Training in ToxicologyT32ES012870 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carmen Joseph Marsit · 2004 to 2026
$9.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES012870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe child feces management (CFM) is likely critical for reducing exposure to fecal pathogens in and around the home, but the effectiveness of different CFM practices in reducing fecal contamination is not well understood. We conducted a cross-sectional study of households with children <6 years in rural Odisha, India, using household surveys (188 households), environmental sample analysis (373 samples for 80 child defecation events), and unstructured observation (33 households) to characterize practices and measure fecal contamination resulting from CFM-related practices, including defecation, feces handling and disposal, defecation area or tool cleaning, anal cleansing, and handwashing. For environmental sampling, we developed a sampling strategy that involved collecting samples at the time and place of child defecation to capture activity-level fecal contamination for CFM practices. Defecating on the floor or ground, which was practiced by 63.7% of children <6 years, was found to increase E. coli contamination on finished floors (p < 0.001) or earthen ground surfaces (p = 0.008) after feces were removed, even if paper was laid down prior to defecation. Use of unsafe tools (e.g., paper, plastic bag, straw/hay) to pick up child feces increased E. coli contamination on caregiver hands after feces handling (p < 0.0001), whereas the use of safe tools (e.g., potty, hoe, scoop) did not increase hand contamination. Points of contamination from cleaning CFM hardware and anal cleansing were also identified. The most common disposal location for feces of children <6 years was to throw feces into an open field (41.6%), with only 32.3% disposed in a latrine. Several households owned scoops or potties, but use was low and we identified shortcomings of these CFM tools and proposed alternative interventions that may be more effective. Overall, our results demonstrate the need for CFM interventions that move beyond focusing solely on feces disposal to address CFM as a holistic set of practices.

Indexed as

FecesChildCross-Sectional StudiesEscherichia coliHumansIndiaRural PopulationSanitationToilet FacilitiesChild fecesFecal contaminationHygieneOpen defecationSanitation

Identifiers

PMID31905545
PMCPMC7031693
OpenAlexW2996757128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.