Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31905497›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2020

Different perspectives of immunizations during pregnancy

Gökce Celep, Aysu Duyan Çamurdan, Fatma Nur Baran Aksakal, Osman Fadil Kara

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Understanding Primary Care Physician Vaccination Behaviour: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gökce CelepDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Amasya University,Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Education and Research Hospital, Amasya, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-6250-5096
Aysu Duyan ÇamurdanDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-8384-7423
Fatma Nur Baran AksakalDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-8624-3307
Osman Fadil KaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, Amasya University,Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Education and Research Hospital, Amasya, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-9029-8733
Amasya Üniversitesi · TRGazi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Pregnant women and infants are at risk of severe lower respiratory tract infections induced by influenza or pertussis. The uptake of both vaccines is poor in spite of proven benefits and safety. We aimed to determine the knowledge and attitude of pregnant women and their primary healthcare providers towards immunization during pregnancy. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional and interventional study was conducted in northern Turkey in 2016. It had 3 different groups including 786 pregnant women, 146 primary healthcare staff, and 97 family practitioners. Different questionnaires were filled by each group. The intervention phase of the study consisted of education of the expectant mothers about immunizations during pregnancy. Results: 786 pregnant women aged between 17–44 years were enrolled to the study. Most of the participants had favourable attitude about vaccination, but only 1.1% had influenza immunization, none had Tdap immunization. None of the participants joining the intervention stage were immunized. The healthcare staff and family physicians had knowledge about vaccinations, but had abstention for administration. Postexposure prophylaxis was also provided by referral centres. Conclusions: Most of the participants either pregnant women or healthcare workers were not vaccinated against pertussis and influenza. Dissemination of maternal immunization must be supported by the team work of healthcare professionals, authorities, universities, professional associations, stake holders, media and patients with current, evidence based knowledge.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelImmunizationAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfluenza VaccinesMiddle AgedPertussis VaccinePregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareTurkeyInfluenza VaccinesPertussis Vaccineadult type pertussis vaccine (Tdap)Immunizationinfluenzapostexposure prophylaxispregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31905497
PMCPMC7164758
OpenAlexW3010479219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.