Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31905495›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2020

Antioxidant effects of dexmedetomidine against hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage in vitro by alkaline Comet assay

Mustafa Sirri Kotanoğlu, Ela Kadioğlu, Esra Emerce, Çetin Kaymak, Ayşe Özcan, Hülya Başar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mustafa Sirri KotanoğluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-6906-573x
Ela KadioğluDepartment of Pharmaceutical Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-2736-992x
Esra EmerceDepartment of Pharmaceutical Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-4069-7941
Çetin KaymakDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5532-6954
Ayşe ÖzcanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-5224-554x
Hülya BaşarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-00032061-5056
Ministry of Health · TRGazi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist that is commonly used as a sedative and anesthetic. The protective effects of DEX against oxidative damage under both in vitro and in vivo conditions have been demonstrated. It was aimed to evaluate and compare the protective effects of DEX and vitamin C (Vit C) on DNA against H2O2-induced DNA damage in human lymphocyte cell cultures in vitro by alkaline Comet assay. Materials and methods: Lymphocyte cell cultures were divided into 5 groups, as the negative control, solvent control, positive control, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; 150 μM) + DEX (1 μM; 2.5 μM; 5 μM), and H2O2 (150 μM) + Vit C (1 μM; 2.5 μM; 5 μM), and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Cell viability was measured using the Trypan blue test. DNA damage was measured using the Alkali Comet Technique and the % percent tail intensity was evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey multiple comparison test. Results: It was observed that H2O2 significantly induced DNA damage in the lymphocytes and this damage was decreased significantly with Vit C and DEX. It was observed that Vit C at doses of 1 μM and 2.5 μM had a significantly stronger antioxidant effect, but there was no significant difference between the antioxidant effects of Vit C and DEX with a dose of 5 μM. The dose of 5 μM DEX was found to be the most effective in reducing oxidative DNA damage. Conclusion: There is limited data on the protective effects of DEX against oxidative DNA damage. The primary effect might be cytoprotection. The results herein showed that DEX was protective against H2O2-induced in vitro oxidative DNA damage in lymphocyte cell cultures in a dose-dependent manner. DEX might have a potential therapeutic value in the prevention of oxidative DNA damage in patients.

Indexed as

AdultAntioxidantsAscorbic AcidCells, CulturedComet AssayCytoprotectionDexmedetomidineDNA DamageHumansHydrogen PeroxideLymphocytesMiddle AgedAntioxidantsAscorbic AcidDexmedetomidineHydrogen PeroxideAntioxidantdexmedetomidineDNA damage

Identifiers

PMID31905495
PMCPMC7491270
OpenAlexW3013823209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.