ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2020
Which Bayley-III cut-off values should be used in different developmental levels?
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of motor development delay in children with craniosynostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Home based early intervention with CareToy-Revised in infants with early brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- The relationships between optimal infant feeding practices and child development and attained height at age 2 years and 6-7 years.Maternal & child nutrition · 2024Trial
- Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Very Preterm Infants Randomised to Receive Two Different Standardised, Concentrated Parenteral Nutrition Regimens.Nutrients · 2023Trial
- Impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, brain injury, necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity and sepsis on neurodevelopmental outcomes in premature infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Maternal obesity and inadequate gestational weight gain disrupts placental dopaminergic signaling: impact on infant neurodevelopment.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Brain MRI before and at term equivalent age predicts motor and cognitive outcomes in very preterm infants.Neuroimage. Reports · 2025Article
- The association of umbilical hyperlactatemia with short- and tong-term outcomes in extremely low birth weight neonates: a matched cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- The effect of preoperative balloon atrial septostomy and intraoperative parameters on neurodevelopmental scoring in neonates operated for transposition of the great artery.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2025Article
- Predictors of language and reading outcomes in 12-year-old children born very preterm.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Article
- Parenting stress in infancy was associated with neurodevelopment in 24-month-old children with congenital heart disease.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Article
- The Effect of Group-Based Early Parent Education on Development in Preterm Infants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impact of severity and age with variable definitions of bronchopulmonary dysplasia on neurodevelopmental outcomes.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- Machine Learning for the Identification of Key Predictors to Bayley Outcomes: A Preterm Cohort Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluation of neurocognitive and social developments after craniosynostosis surgery.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Evaluation of apparently healthy Egyptian infants and toddlers on the bayley-III scales according to age and sex.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Neurodevelopment Outcomes in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants with Metabolic Bone Disease at 2 Years of Age.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollution is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023Article
- Association between intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry and adverse perinatal and long-term outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.HRB open research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Latest version of Bayley Scales (Bayley-III) and its predecessor (BSID-II) are the most widely used standardized developmental tools in infancy and early childhood. Recent studies showed that Bayley-III scores were higher than BSID-II in 18–24 month-old and mostly premature infants. We aimed to evaluate the generalization of inflated scores of Bayley-III to children aged 6–42 months with different disease groups, and to find out which cut-off points should be used in Bayley-III to detect mild, moderate, and severe developmental delay according to BSID-II standard cut-off points. Materials and methods: Two hundred and fifty-five children aged 6–42 months with different diseases and developmental levels were administered both the Bayley-III and BSID-II in the same session between 15 November 2017 and 15 April 2018. Results: The mean Bayley-III Cognitive Composite (CC) and Cognitive Language Composite (CLC) scores were respectively 13.1 ± 9.1 and 8.6 ± 8 points higher than BSID-II Mental Development Index (MDI) scores (P < 0.001). The mean Bayley-III Motor Composite (MC) scores were 14.4 ± 10.5 points higher than BSID-II Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) scores (P < 0.001). Cognitive delay was found in 126 (49.4%) and 59 (23.1%) children according to BSID-II MDI and Bayley-III CC scores, respectively. Motor delay was found in 174 (69.3%) and 86 (34.3%) children according to the BSID-II PDI and Bayley-III MC scores, respectively. Children had less cognitive (48.6%) and motor delay (54.5%) according to Bayley-III scores. Bayley-III scores were significantly higher than BSID-II scores for all ages (P < 0.001). According to ROC analysis the cut-off scores for mild, moderate, and severe delay were 92.5, 83.2, and 71.2 for Bayley-III CLC; and 98.5, 86.5, and 74.5 for Bayley-III MC, respectively. Conclusion: Bayley-III scores should be interpreted carefully for all age ranges and different diagnosis. The risk for underestimation of developmental delays by Bayley-III should be kept in mind. Different Bayley-III cut-off scores should be used to define developmental delay levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.