Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31905322›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of public health2020

Social Media- and Internet-Based Disease Surveillance for Public Health.

Allison E Aiello, Audrey Renson, Paul N Zivich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A descriptive analysis of multi-jurisdictional enteric illness messaging web analytics data, 2020-2022.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allison E AielloDepartment of Epidemiology, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7435, USA; email: aaiello@email.unc.edu, arenson@live.unc.edu, pzivich@live.unc.edu.
Audrey RensonDepartment of Epidemiology, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7435, USA; email: aaiello@email.unc.edu, arenson@live.unc.edu, pzivich@live.unc.edu.
Paul N ZivichDepartment of Epidemiology, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7435, USA; email: aaiello@email.unc.edu, arenson@live.unc.edu, pzivich@live.unc.edu.

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
From Biological to Social Processes: Interdisciplinary Training in Life Course ResearchT32HD091058 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT A HUMMER, Amanda L Thompson · 2017 to 2026
$4.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD091058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease surveillance systems are a cornerstone of public health tracking and prevention. This review addresses the use, promise, perils, and ethics of social media- and Internet-based data collection for public health surveillance. Our review highlights untapped opportunities for integrating digital surveillance in public health and current applications that could be improved through better integration, validation, and clarity on rules surrounding ethical considerations. Promising developments include hybrid systems that couple traditional surveillance data with data from search queries, social media posts, and crowdsourcing. In the future, it will be important to identify opportunities for public and private partnerships, train public health experts in data science, reduce biases related to digital data (gathered from Internet use, wearable devices, etc.), and address privacy. We are on the precipice of an unprecedented opportunity to track, predict, and prevent global disease burdens in the population using digital data.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityData CollectionHumansInternetPublic HealthPublic Health SurveillanceSocial MediaWearable Electronic Devicesbig datadigital healthinfectious diseasesmhealthsocial mediasurveillance

Identifiers

PMID31905322
PMCPMC7959655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.