Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31905263›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2020

Machine Learning in Drug Discovery and Development Part 1: A Primer.

Alan Talevi, Juan Francisco Morales, Gregory Hather, Jagdeep T Podichetty, Sarah Kim, Peter C Bloomingdale, Samuel Kim, Jackson Burton, Joshua D Brown, Almut G Winterstein and 3 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Modeling Amid the Rise of Agentic AI.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Substituted 1,4-naphthoquinones for potential anticancer therapeutics:Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alan TaleviLaboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo de Bioactivos (LIDeB), Faculty of Exact Sciences, National University of La Plata (UNLP), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan Francisco MoralesLaboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo de Bioactivos (LIDeB), Faculty of Exact Sciences, National University of La Plata (UNLP), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gregory HatherStatistical & Quantitative Sciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jagdeep T PodichettyQuantitative Medicine, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Sarah KimCenter for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9179-0735
Peter C BloomingdaleQuantitative Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Merck & Co. Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Samuel KimCanary Speech LLC, Provo, Utah, USA.
Jackson BurtonQuantitative Medicine, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Joshua D BrownCenter for Drug Evaluation and Safety, Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Almut G WintersteinCenter for Drug Evaluation and Safety, Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6518-5961
Stephan SchmidtCenter for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Jensen Kael WhiteQuantitative Medicine, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Daniela J Conradoe-Quantify LLC, La Jolla, California, USA.

Funding

Critical Path to Public Private PartnershipsU18FD005320 · FDA · CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE · PI Klaus Romero · 2014 to 2026
$127.1M
FDA HHS U18 FD005320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence, in particular machine learning (ML), has emerged as a key promising pillar to overcome the high failure rate in drug development. Here, we present a primer on the ML algorithms most commonly used in drug discovery and development. We also list possible data sources, describe good practices for ML model development and validation, and share a reproducible example. A companion article will summarize applications of ML in drug discovery, drug development, and postapproval phase.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDrug ApprovalDrug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryHistory, 20th CenturyHumansMachine LearningModels, TheoreticalPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID31905263
PMCPMC7080529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.