Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31905208›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Effects of supplemental creatine and guanidinoacetic acid on spatial memory and the brain of weaned Yucatan miniature pigs.

Jason L Robinson, Laura E McBreairty, Rebecca A Ryan, Raniru Randunu, Carolyn J Walsh, Gerard M Martin, Janet A Brunton, Robert F Bertolo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason L RobinsonDepartment of Biochemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Laura E McBreairtyDepartment of Biochemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Rebecca A RyanDepartment of Biochemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Raniru RandunuDepartment of Biochemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Carolyn J WalshDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Gerard M MartinDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Janet A BruntonDepartment of Biochemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Robert F BertoloDepartment of Biochemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5069-5785
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of creatine as a potential cognitive enhancement supplement for humans prompted an investigation as to whether supplemental creatine could enhance spatial memory in young swine. We assessed memory performance and brain concentrations of creatine and its precursor guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) in 14-16-week-old male Yucatan miniature pigs supplemented for 2 weeks with either 200 mg/kg∙d creatine (+Cr; n = 7) or equimolar GAA (157 mg/kg∙d) (+GAA; n = 8) compared to controls (n = 14). Spatial memory tests had pigs explore distinct sets of objects for 5 min. Objects were spatially controlled, and we assessed exploration times of previously viewed objects relative to novel objects in familiar or novel locations. There was no effect of either supplementation on memory performance, but pigs successfully identified novel objects after 10 (p < 0.01) and 20 min (p < 0.01) retention intervals. Moreover, pigs recognized spatial transfers after 65 min (p < 0.05). Regression analyses identified associations between the ability to identify novel objects in memory tests and concentrations of creatine and GAA in cerebellum, and GAA in prefrontal cortex (p < 0.05). The concentration of creatine in brain regions was not influenced by creatine supplementation, but GAA supplementation increased GAA concentration in cerebellum (p < 0.05), and the prefrontal cortex of +GAA pigs had more creatine/g and less GAA/g compared to +Cr pigs (p < 0.05). Creatine kinase activity and maximal reaction velocity were also higher with GAA supplementation in prefrontal cortex (p < 0.05). In conclusion, there appears to be a relationship between memory performance and guanidino compounds in the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex, but the effects were unrelated to dietary supplementation. The cerebellum is identified as a target site for GAA accretion.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimal FeedAnimalsBrainCreatineDietGlycineMaleSpatial MemorySwineSwine, MiniatureWeaningCreatineGlycineglycocyamine

Identifiers

PMID31905208
PMCPMC6944358
OpenAlexW2998534989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.