Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31905113›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of psychology2020

Event Perception and Memory.

Jeffrey M Zacks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neurobiological influences on event perception: the role of catecholamines.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The temporal organization of memory and emotion is reciprocally coupled.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jeffrey M ZacksDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA; email: jzacks@wustl.edu.

Funding

EVERYDAY MEMORY IN AGING AND EARLY ALZHEIMER'S DISEASER21AG052314 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZACKS, JEFFREY M · 2016 to 2017
$419k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG052314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Events make up much of our lived experience, and the perceptual mechanisms that represent events in experience have pervasive effects on action control, language use, and remembering. Event representations in both perception and memory have rich internal structure and connections one to another, and both are heavily informed by knowledge accumulated from previous experiences. Event perception and memory have been identified with specific computational and neural mechanisms, which show protracted development in childhood and are affected by language use, expertise, and brain disorders and injuries. Current theoretical approaches focus on the mechanisms by which events are segmented from ongoing experience, and emphasize the common coding of events for perception, action, and memory. Abetted by developments in eye-tracking, neuroimaging, and computer science, research on event perception and memory is moving from small-scale laboratory analogs to the complexity of events in the wild.

Indexed as

Cognitive NeuroscienceMemory, EpisodicExecutive FunctionHumansPerceptionaction controlcognitive developmentcognitive neuroscienceepisodic memoryevent perceptionfilmmedia

Identifiers

PMID31905113
PMCPMC8679009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.