ArticleJournal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering2020
LC-ICP-OES method for antimony speciation analysis in liquid samples.
Article in Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing Antimony Speciation Analysis via Frontal Chromatography-ICP-MS to Explore the Release of PET Additives.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Sensitive Silver-Enhanced Microplate Apta-Enzyme Assay of SbMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A method for the analysis of different species of antimony (Sb) that couples liquid chromatography with an inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (LC-ICP-OES) system is presented. The method is simple and reliable to separate and quantify directly and simultaneously Sb(III) and Sb(V) in aqueous samples. The calibration curves showed high linearity at the three wavelengths tested. The limits of detection ranged from 24.9 to 32.3 μg/L for Sb(III) and from 36.2 to 46.0 μg/L for Sb(V), at the three wavelengths evaluated. The limit of detection for this method varied depending on the wavelength used. The lowest limit of quantification for Sb(V) (49.9 μg/L) and Sb(III) (80.7 μg/L) was obtained at a wavelength of 217.582 nm. The method sensitivity for Sb(V) was higher compared to Sb(III) at all the wavelengths considered. Samples containing different concentrations of Sb(III) and Sb(V) in three different matrices, i.e., water, basal culture medium, and anaerobic sludge plus basal medium, were analyzed. The coefficients of variation were low and ranged from 0.1 to 5.0 depending on the sample matrix. Recoveries of Sb(III) and Sb(V) were higher than 90% independently of the matrix analyzed and the wavelength used in the analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.