ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
LiPLike: towards gene regulatory network predictions of high certainty.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Unravelling key genes and molecular pathways in gastric inflammation-to-cancer transition through causal discovery: implications for early diagnosis and therapy.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- Structure-primed embedding on the transcription factor manifold enables transparent model architectures for gene regulatory network and latent activity inference.Genome biology · 2024Article
- A comprehensive mechanistic model of adipocyte signaling with layers of confidence.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2023Article
- Mini-review: Gene regulatory network benefits from three-dimensional chromatin conformation and structural biology.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Integrated Drug Mining Reveals Actionable Strategies Inhibiting Plexiform Neurofibromas.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- RSNET: inferring gene regulatory networks by a redundancy silencing and network enhancement technique.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Deep neural network prediction of genome-wide transcriptome signatures - beyond the Black-box.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022Article
- Review
- ComHub: Community predictions of hubs in gene regulatory networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Computational biology approaches for mapping transcriptional regulatory networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Hybrid modelling for stroke care: Review and suggestions of new approaches for risk assessment and simulation of scenarios.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationHigh correlation in expression between regulatory elements is a persistent obstacle for the reverse-engineering of gene regulatory networks. If two potential regulators have matching expression patterns, it becomes challenging to differentiate between them, thus increasing the risk of false positive identifications.
resultsTo allow for gene regulation predictions of high confidence, we propose a novel method, the Linear Profile Likelihood (LiPLike), that assumes a regression model and iteratively searches for interactions that cannot be replaced by a linear combination of other predictors. To compare the performance of LiPLike with other available inference methods, we benchmarked LiPLike using three independent datasets from the Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods 5 (DREAM5) network inference challenge. We found that LiPLike could be used to stratify predictions of other inference tools, and when applied to the predictions of DREAM5 participants, we observed an average improvement in accuracy of >140% compared to individual methods. Furthermore, LiPLike was able to independently predict networks better than all DREAM5 participants when applied to biological data. When predicting the Escherichia coli network, LiPLike had an accuracy of 0.38 for the top-ranked 100 interactions, whereas the corresponding DREAM5 consensus model yielded an accuracy of 0.11. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We made LiPLike available to the community as a Python toolbox, available at https://gitlab.com/Gustafsson-lab/liplike. We believe that LiPLike will be used for high confidence predictions in studies where individual model interactions are of high importance, and to remove false positive predictions made by other state-of-the-art gene-gene regulation prediction tools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.