Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31904664›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in hematology2020

Relapsed or primary refractory AML: moving past MEC and FLAG-ida.

Kristin Koenig, Alice Mims

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How to improve AML outcomes?Blood research · 2024
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Treatment Patterns andTherapeutics and clinical risk management · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A retrospective comparison of salvage intensive chemotherapyTherapeutic advances in hematology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin KoenigDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University and The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Alice Mims
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTreatment of relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is still very challenging, with poor response rates and low chance for cure. This is especially true when treating patients who are elderly, have multiple comorbidities, or who are too unfit for traditional salvage chemotherapy regimens. RECENT

findingsRecently, advances in the treatment of relapsed/refractory AML utilizing novel chemotherapy combinations, hypomethylating, and targeted therapies have shown promising results. SUMMARY: Several early-phase studies with novel targeted therapy combinations have demonstrated encouraging results warranting larger, comparative studies. This has expanded the access of treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory AML who cannot receive traditional salvage chemotherapy. These newer treatments have the potential to outperform traditional chemotherapy as well.

Indexed as

HumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID31904664
PMCPMC7015186
OpenAlexW2997904704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.