Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31904595›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in ophthalmology2020

Circumferential canal surgery: a brief history.

Jaime E Dickerson, Reay H Brown

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Ab-interno Trabeculotomy Procedures: A Review.Journal of current ophthalmology
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jaime E DickersonSight Sciences Inc., Menlo Park, California.
Reay H BrownSight Sciences Inc., Menlo Park, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMost microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) procedures bypass outflow resistance residing proximally in the trabecular meshwork and inner wall of Schlemm's canal. A novel procedure combining trabeculotomy with viscodilation adds to this by also addressing distal resistance of the canal and collector channel ostia. This review examines the development and evidence for both trabeculotomy and canaloplasty separately and the combination in a single procedure. RECENT

findingsRecent aqueous angiography studies have confirmed the segmental nature of outflow through Schlemm's canal highlighting the need to address distal outflow pathway resistance. Combined trabeculotomy and viscodilation ab interno is a novel approach with a new purpose-designed device (OMNI Surgical System) becoming available to surgeons in early 2018. Recent results as both a standalone and combined with cataract procedure demonstrate significant intraocular pressure reductions with an average 41% reduction from baseline in the pseudophakic group. SUMMARY: Targeting both distal as well as proximal points of outflow resistance in the conventional pathway may prove to be a highly efficacious MIGS modality. Additional large prospective studies are currently ongoing to confirm these preliminary results.

Indexed as

Aqueous HumorGlaucoma, Open-AngleHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansIntraocular PressureLimbus CorneaeTrabecular MeshworkTrabeculectomy

Identifiers

PMID31904595
PMCPMC7012345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.