Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31904426›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cancer biology2021

Machine and deep learning approaches for cancer drug repurposing.

Naiem T Issa, Vasileios Stathias, Stephan Schürer, Sivanesan Dakshanamurthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cancer biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naiem T IssaDr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Vasileios StathiasDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Stephan SchürerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Sivanesan DakshanamurthyDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: sd233@georgetown.edu.

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Louis M Weiner · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Data Coordination and Integration Center for LINCS-BD2KU54HL127624 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MA'AYAN, AVI, SCHURER, STEPHAN C · 2014 to 2019
$23.5M
Resource Dissemination and Outreach Center for Illuminating the Druggable GenomeU24TR002278 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SCHURER, STEPHAN C, SKLAR, LARRY A. · 2018 to 2023
$3.7M
Unifying Templates, Ontologies and Tools to Achieve Effective Annotation of Bioassay ProtocolsU01LM012630 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BUNIN, BARRY A, MUSEN, MARK A · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR002278NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL127624NLM NIH HHS U01 LM012630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the underpinnings of cancer initiation, progression and metastasis has increased exponentially in recent years. Advanced "omics" coupled with machine learning and artificial intelligence (deep learning) methods have helped elucidate targets and pathways critical to those processes that may be amenable to pharmacologic modulation. However, the current anti-cancer therapeutic armamentarium continues to lag behind. As the cost of developing a new drug remains prohibitively expensive, repurposing of existing approved and investigational drugs is sought after given known safety profiles and reduction in the cost barrier. Notably, successes in oncologic drug repurposing have been infrequent. Computational in-silico strategies have been developed to aid in modeling biological processes to find new disease-relevant targets and discovering novel drug-target and drug-phenotype associations. Machine and deep learning methods have especially enabled leaps in those successes. This review will discuss these methods as they pertain to cancer biology as well as immunomodulation for drug repurposing opportunities in oncologic diseases.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug DiscoveryMachine LearningAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsArtificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyDrug RepositioningHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDrug discoveryDrug repurposingMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID31904426
PMCPMC7723306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.