Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31903722›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2020

Pig trade networks through live pig markets in Guangdong Province, China.

Yin Li, Baoxu Huang, Chaojian Shen, Chang Cai, Youming Wang, John Edwards, Guihong Zhang, Ian D Robertson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Development of a multilocus sequence typing tool forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A scoping review on the epidemiology and public significance ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yin LiSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5720-5267
Baoxu HuangSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Chaojian ShenChina Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, China.
Chang CaiResearch and Innovation Office, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Youming WangChina Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, China.
John EdwardsSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Guihong ZhangSouth China Agriculture University, Guangzhou, China.
Ian D RobertsonSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Murdoch University · AUChina Animal Health and Epidemiology Center · CNSouth China Agricultural University · CNZhejiang A & F University · CN

Funding

Innovation Funding of China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center 201606National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC1200500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study used social network analysis to investigate the indirect contact network between counties through the movement of live pigs through four wholesale live pig markets in Guangdong Province, China. All 14,118 trade records for January and June 2016 were collected from the markets and the patterns of pig trade in these markets analysed. Maps were developed to show the movement pathways. Evaluating the network between source counties was the primary objective of this study. A 1-mode network was developed. Characteristics of the trading network were explored, and the degree, betweenness and closeness were calculated for each source county. Models were developed to compare the impacts of different disease control strategies on the potential magnitude of an epidemic spreading through this network. The results show that pigs from 151 counties were delivered to the four wholesale live pig markets in January and/or June 2016. More batches (truckloads of pigs sourced from one or more piggeries) were traded in these markets in January (8,001) than in June 2016 (6,117). The pigs were predominantly sourced from counties inside Guangdong Province (90%), along with counties in Hunan, Guangxi, Jiangxi, Fujian and Henan provinces. The major source counties (46 in total) contributed 94% of the total batches during the two-month study period. Pigs were sourced from piggeries located 10 to 1,417 km from the markets. The distribution of the nodes' degrees in both January and June indicates a free-scale network property, and the network in January had a higher clustering coefficient (0.54 vs. 0.39) and a shorter average pathway length (1.91 vs. 2.06) than that in June. The most connected counties of the network were in the central, northern and western regions of Guangdong Province. Compared with randomly removing counties from the network, eliminating counties with higher betweenness, degree or closeness resulted in a greater reduction of the magnitude of a potential epidemic. The findings of this study can be used to inform targeted control interventions for disease spread through this live pig market trade network in south China.

Indexed as

AnimalsChinaCommerceCommunicable Disease ControlEpidemicsModels, BiologicalSwineSwine Diseasesanimal movementdisease controlnew intervention strategiessocial networkveterinary epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID31903722
PMCPMC7228257
OpenAlexW3000376264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.