Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31903684›Full record

SynthesisTransfusion medicine (Oxford, England)2020

Pre-hospital transfusion of red blood cells. Part 2: A systematic review of treatment effects on outcomes.

Elisabeth C van Turenhout, Sebastiaan M Bossers, Stephan A Loer, Georgios F Giannakopoulos, Lothar A Schwarte, Patrick Schober

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prehospital plasma transfusion versus standard of care following traumatic injury: a review of the systematic reviews and a meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Blood transfusion training for prehospital providers: a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Prehospital Blood Administration in Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Article
  10. Characteristics of traumatic major haemorrhage in a tertiary trauma center.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Unmanned aerial vehicles and pre-hospital emergency medicine.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisabeth C van TurenhoutDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3168-0427
Sebastiaan M BossersDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2396-2777
Stephan A LoerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Georgios F GiannakopoulosDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lothar A SchwarteDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Patrick SchoberDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-081X
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary aim of this systematic review is to describe the effects of prehospital transfusion of red blood cells (PHTRBC) on patient outcomes. Damage control resuscitation attempts to prevent death through haemorrhage in trauma patients. In this context, transfusion of red blood cells is increasingly used by emergency medical services (EMS). However, evidence on the effects on outcomes is scarce. PubMed and Web of Science were searched through January 2019; 55 articles were included. No randomised controlled studies were identified. While several observational studies suggest an increased survival after PHTRBC, consistent evidence for beneficial effects of PHTRBC on survival was not found. PHTRBC appears to improve haemodynamic parameters, but there is no evidence that shock on arrival to hospital is averted, nor of an association with trauma induced coagulopathy or with length of stay in hospitals or intensive care units. In conclusion, PHTRBC is increasingly used by EMS, but there is no strong evidence for effects of PHTRBC on mortality. Further research with study designs that allow causal inferences is required for more conclusive evidence. The combination of PHTRBC with plasma, as well as the use of individualised transfusion criteria, may potentially show more benefits and should be thoroughly investigated in the future. The review was registered at Prospero (CRD42018084658).

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesErythrocyte TransfusionResuscitationHemorrhageHumansdamage control resuscitationemergency medical servicemajor haemorrhagemortalityoutcomeprehospital transfusionred blood cells

Identifiers

PMID31903684
PMCPMC7317762
OpenAlexW2998993032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.