ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2020
Clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in non-dialysis patients with acute coronary syndrome and advanced renal dysfunction.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determinants of stroke following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Lipoprotein a Combined with Fibrinogen as an Independent Predictor of Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Article
- Prognostic value of peripheral blood circular RNAs in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- Long-term renal outcomes after elective percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with advanced renal dysfunction.Heart and vessels · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData about the clinical outcomes of ACS patients with advanced renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m
methodsWe examined the data obtained from 194 ACS patients with non-dialysis advanced renal dysfunction who underwent PCI at five hospitals. The primary composite endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke).
resultsEighty patients (41.2%) were diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and 117 patients (58.8%) with non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). Overall patients were followed for a median of 657.5 days. Cumulative incidence of MACCE at median follow-up was 32.3% (45.4% for STEMI and 23.4% for NSTE-ACS). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients in the STEMI group had significantly higher incidence of MACCE than those in the non-STEMI and unstable angina group (Log-rank p < 0.001). In-hospital MACCE rate was higher in the STEMI group than in the NSTE-ACS group, whereas post-discharge MACCE rate was comparable between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, STEMI and Killip classification ≥ 2 were associated with in-hospital MACCE. On the other hand, body mass index and serum albumin at admission were independent predictors of post-discharge MACCE.
conclusionsShort- and long-term prognoses following PCI in non-dialysis patients with ACS and advanced renal dysfunction is still unfavorable. STEMI and Killip classification ≥ 2 were independent predictors for in-hospital MACCE, and body mass index and serum albumin were for post-discharge MACCE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.