Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31903466›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials science2020

Opposite responses of normal hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma cells to substrate viscoelasticity.

Kalpana Mandal, Ze Gong, Alexis Rylander, Vivek B Shenoy, Paul A Janmey

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Traction Force Microscopy for Viscoelastic Substrates: A Semi-Analytical Method.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Matrix degradation enhances stress relaxation, regulating cell adhesion and spreading.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Degradability tunes ECM stress relaxation and cellular mechanics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Material properties of nonpregnant and pregnant human uterine layers.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Gradual Stress-Relaxation of Hydrogel Regulates Cell Spreading.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kalpana MandalInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA. mandalk@pennmedicine.upenn.edu janmey@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Ze Gong
Alexis Rylander
Vivek B Shenoy
Paul A Janmey

Funding

Structural basis of the specific protein-protein interactions underlying IF assemP01GM096971 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLDMAN, ROBERT D · 2011 to 2021
$16.8M
Pathological consequences of altered tissue mechanics in fibrosisR01EB017753 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JANMEY, PAUL A, SHENOY, VIVEK · 2014 to 2025
$6.3M
Regulation of cell, tissue, and nucleus function by mechanical properties of biopolymer networksR35GM136259 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Paul A Janmey · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017753NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM096971NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellular microenvironment plays a critical role in cell differentiation, proliferation, migration, and homeostasis. Recent studies have shown the importance of substrate viscosity in determining cellular function. Here, we study the mechanoresponse of normal hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HCC) to elastic and viscoelastic substrates using the Huh7 cell line derived from a human liver tumor and primary human hepatocytes (PHH). Unlike PHH and fibroblasts, which respond to viscoelastic substrates by reducing spreading area and actin bundle assembly compared to purely elastic substrates of the same stiffness, Huh7 cells spread faster on viscoelastic substrates than on purely elastic substrates. The steady state spreading areas of Huh7 cells are larger on viscoelastic substrates, whereas the opposite effect occurs with PHH cells. The viscoelasticity of the microenvironment also promotes motility and multiple long protrusions in Huh7 cells. Pharmacologic disruption of the actin assembly makes cells unable to spread on either elastic or viscoelastic substrates. In contrast, upon vimentin perturbation, cells still spread to a limited degree on elastic substrates but are unable to spread on viscoelastic substrates. The time evolution of cell traction force shows that the peak occurs at an earlier time point on viscoelastic substrates compared to elastic substrates. However, the total force generation at steady state is the same on both substrates after 4 hours. Our data suggest that stress relaxation time scales of the viscoelastic substrate regulate cell dynamics and traction force generation, indicating different binding-unbinding rates of the proteins that form cell attachment sites in HCC cells and normal hepatocytes. These results suggest that liver cancer cells may have different characteristic lifetimes of binding to the substrate in comparision to normal cells, which might cause differences in cell spreading and motility within the diseased tissue.

Indexed as

ElasticityCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell Line, TumorHepatocytesHumansLiver NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentVimentinViscosityVimentin

Identifiers

PMID31903466
PMCPMC8317444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.