Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31903300›Full record

ArticleAdvances in wound care2020

The Wound Healing Index for Predicting Venous Leg Ulcer Outcome.

Caroline E Fife, Susan D Horn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in wound care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Prognostic models for clinical outcomes in patients with venous leg ulcers: A systematic review.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Independent Prognostic Factors for Predicting Wound Healing in People With Venous Leg Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Wound Care for Venous Ulceration.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline E FifeU.S. Wound Registry, The Woodlands, Texas.
Susan D HornInternational Severity Information Systems, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Logistic ModelsWound HealingHumansPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUnited StatesVaricose Ulcerpredictive factors of healingquality reportingrisk stratificationvenous leg ulcerswound healing index

Identifiers

PMID31903300
PMCPMC6940587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.