Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31903274›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2019

Qualitative and quantitative imaging features of pulmonary subsolid nodules: differentiating invasive adenocarcinoma from minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and preinvasive lesions.

Linlin Qi, Wenwen Lu, Lin Yang, Wei Tang, Shijun Zhao, Yao Huang, Ning Wu, Jianwei Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Relationship betweenKorean journal of radiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Linlin QiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Wenwen LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Lin YangDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Wei TangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Shijun ZhaoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Yao HuangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Ning WuDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Jianwei WangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNNational Clinical Research · USPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore the role of qualitative and quantitative imaging features of pulmonary subsolid nodules (SSNs) in differentiating invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) from minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and preinvasive lesions.

methodsWe reviewed the clinical records of our institute from October 2010 to December 2015 and included 316 resected SSNs from 287 patients: 260 pure ground-glass nodules, 47 part-solid nodules with solid components ≤5 mm, and 9 ground-glass nodules (GGNs) with cystic airspaces. According to the pathologic review results, 307 SSNs in addition to nine GGNs with cystic airspaces were divided into two groups: A, including atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) (n=15), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (n=56), and MIA (n=41); B, including 195 IACs. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for IAC.

resultsUnivariate analysis showed significant differences between groups regarding patient age, mean diameter, mean and relative computed tomography (CT) values, volume, mass (all P<0.001), and morphological features including lobulated sign (P<0.001), spiculated sign (P=0.028), vacuole sign/air bronchogram (P<0.001), and pleural retraction (P=0.017). Binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated the SSN mass as the only independent risk factor of IAC (odds ratio, 1.007; P<0.001), with an optimal cutoff value of 283.2 mg [area under curve (AUC): 0.859; sensitivity: 68.7%; specificity: 92.9%]. Among lepidic, acinar, and papillary adenocarcinomas, we found significant differences for the vacuole sign/air bronchogram (P=0.032) and mean and relative CT values (P<0.001). All nine GGNs with cystic airspaces were IACs.

conclusionsThe SSN mass with an optimal cutoff value of 283.2 mg may be reliable for differentiating IAC from MIA and preinvasive lesions.

Indexed as

adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)logistic regressionlung neoplasmsSolitary pulmonary noduletomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID31903274
PMCPMC6940263
OpenAlexW2991398842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.