ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2019
Current status and evolution of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery in Germany-results from a nationwide survey.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of a robot-assisted thoracic surgery program at a German center: analysis of the first 100 consecutive cases.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Robot-Assisted Versus Open Surgery for the Resection of Large Thymomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Results of an exploratory survey within ESTS membership in 2022 on current trend of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery and its training perspectives.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Clinical effectiveness of robotic-assisted compared to open or video-assisted lobectomy in Germany: a real-world data analysis.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of pulmonary sequestration in children.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2024Article
- [Perioperative pain therapy in minimally invasive thoracic surgery].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2023Review
- Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A propensity score matched analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
- The use of advanced robotic simulation labs to advance and assess senior resident robotic skills and operating room leadership competency: a pilot study.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Article
- Establishment of Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Program.Journal of chest surgery · 2021Article
- [Robot-assisted thoracic surgery-Areas of application and limitations].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Review
- Perioperative Outcome of Robotic ApproachFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- [Robotics in thoracic surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobot-assisted surgery has made a significant entry into surgical practice within Germany, including thoracic surgery. As no published data exists regarding robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), we conducted a survey to investigate its current status.
methodsWe performed a nationwide survey of all centers active in RATS, using a standardized questionnaire. The annual number of operations, mean duration of surgery, docking time, length of hospital stay(s), conversions, chest tube duration, the RATS program start date, robot system used, operating room capacity, and staplers and instruments used were recorded.
resultsOf the 22 centers contacted, 14 responded. In total, 786 RATS interventions were recorded. Most were anatomical lung resections, comprising 372 (bi-) lobectomies and 80 segmentectomies. During the study period, eight bronchoplastic procedures were performed robotically. There were 93 wedge lung resections, 148 thymectomies, 26 sympathectomies, and 59 other RATS procedures, and a single-center series of around 1,000 RATS thymectomies (excluded from statistical analysis). The average incision-suture time of the RATS lobectomy was 245 (range, 80-419) minutes, average residence time seven days. The conversion rate was 6.7% across all interventions, with significant inter-intervention differences. All surveyed centers plan to further expand RATS, with OR capacity being a frequent impediment. Five RATS interventions were performed in Germany in 2013, versus 320 in 2018.
conclusionsOverall, RATS is becoming more established in everyday clinical practice in Germany. The number of operations, active centers, and trained RATS surgeons has increased steadily since 2013. A German-speaking operation course for entry into RATS already exists. Even extended resections can be carried out safely, and RATS has become standard procedure in some centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.