Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31903271›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2019

Current status and evolution of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery in Germany-results from a nationwide survey.

Thorben Möller, Jan-Hendrik Egberts, Martin Eichhorn, Hans-Stefan Hofmann, Ingo Krüger, Jens-C Rückert, Tim Sandhaus, Matthias Steinert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. [Robot-assisted thoracic surgery-Areas of application and limitations].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Review
  13. Perioperative Outcome of Robotic ApproachFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. [Robotics in thoracic surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thorben MöllerDepartment for General, Visceral-, Thoracic-, Transplantation-, and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.
Jan-Hendrik EgbertsDepartment for General, Visceral-, Thoracic-, Transplantation-, and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.
Martin EichhornDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans-Stefan HofmannDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
Ingo KrügerDepartment of Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rhein-Maas Klinikum, Würselen, Germany.
Jens-C RückertDepartment of Surgery, Competence Center of Thoracic Surgery, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Tim SandhausDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Matthias SteinertDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobot-assisted surgery has made a significant entry into surgical practice within Germany, including thoracic surgery. As no published data exists regarding robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), we conducted a survey to investigate its current status.

methodsWe performed a nationwide survey of all centers active in RATS, using a standardized questionnaire. The annual number of operations, mean duration of surgery, docking time, length of hospital stay(s), conversions, chest tube duration, the RATS program start date, robot system used, operating room capacity, and staplers and instruments used were recorded.

resultsOf the 22 centers contacted, 14 responded. In total, 786 RATS interventions were recorded. Most were anatomical lung resections, comprising 372 (bi-) lobectomies and 80 segmentectomies. During the study period, eight bronchoplastic procedures were performed robotically. There were 93 wedge lung resections, 148 thymectomies, 26 sympathectomies, and 59 other RATS procedures, and a single-center series of around 1,000 RATS thymectomies (excluded from statistical analysis). The average incision-suture time of the RATS lobectomy was 245 (range, 80-419) minutes, average residence time seven days. The conversion rate was 6.7% across all interventions, with significant inter-intervention differences. All surveyed centers plan to further expand RATS, with OR capacity being a frequent impediment. Five RATS interventions were performed in Germany in 2013, versus 320 in 2018.

conclusionsOverall, RATS is becoming more established in everyday clinical practice in Germany. The number of operations, active centers, and trained RATS surgeons has increased steadily since 2013. A German-speaking operation course for entry into RATS already exists. Even extended resections can be carried out safely, and RATS has become standard procedure in some centers.

Indexed as

Germanyrobotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS)roboticsThoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID31903271
PMCPMC6940261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.