Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31903183›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hematologic oncology2019

Outcome of donor and recipient sex match versus mismatch in stem cell transplant procedure.

Natasha Ali, Hayat Ullah, Mohammad Usman Shaikh, Salman Naseem Adil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hematologic oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Donor Characteristics Predict the Success of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Thalassemia Major: A Single-Center Analysis of 250 Patients.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha AliAssociate Professor Haematology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine/Oncology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hayat UllahConsultant Clinical Haematologist, Department of Oncology/Radiotherapy, Bolan Medical Complex Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.
Mohammad Usman ShaikhAssociate Professor Haematology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine/Oncology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Salman Naseem AdilProfessor Haematology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine/Oncology, Aga Khan University Karachi, Pakistan.
Aga Khan University · PKBolan Medical College · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe determined the frequency of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and overall survival (OS) in sex matched vs mismatched transplant.

methodsMedical records were analyzed of patients undergoing transplant from 2004 to 2016. Variables included age, sex of patient and donor, indication, conditioning regimen, stem cell source, frequency of GvHD and OS.

resultsWe performed n = 162 allogeneic stem cell transplants. The most common conditioning regimen was busulfan/cyclophosphamide (n = 64). There was no difference in the frequency of GvHD in both groups. The transplant related mortality was higher (8.7%) in sex-mismatched transplants. The OS in both groups was similar.

conclusionOur study showed higher transplant-related mortality in sex-mismatched transplant. There was no difference in GvHD and OS in both groups.

Indexed as

allogeneic transplantsmismatchsex

Identifiers

PMID31903183
PMCPMC6939220
OpenAlexW2995965076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.