Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31903096›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2019

Reasons to switch: a noninterventional study evaluating immunotherapy switches in a large German multicentre cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Mathias Mäurer, Klaus Tiel-Wilck, Eckard Oehm, Nils Richter, Michael Springer, Patrick Oschmann, Arndt Manzel, Stefanie Hieke-Schulz, Vera Zingler, Julia A Kandenwein and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathias MäurerKlinikum Würzburg Mitte, Standort Juliusspital, Würzburg, Germany.
Klaus Tiel-WilckNeurologisches Facharztzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Eckard OehmGroup practice for Neurology, Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Freiburg, Germany.
Nils RichterGroup practice for Neurology, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Michael SpringerNeurological practice Dr. Springer, Pirmasens, Germany.
Patrick OschmannKlinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Arndt ManzelRoche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.
Stefanie Hieke-SchulzRoche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.
Vera ZinglerF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Julia A KandenweinRoche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.
Tjalf ZiemssenUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8799-8202
Ralf A LinkerNeurologische Klinik der Universität Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 84, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8740-3106
Roche Pharma AG (Germany) · DEBayreuth Medical Center · DEKlinikum Würzburg Mitte · DERoche (Switzerland) · CHSpringer Nature (Germany) · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith a large array of disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), identifying the optimal treatment option for the individual patient is challenging and switching of immunotherapies is often required. The objective of this study was to systematically investigate reasons for DMT switching in patients on immunotherapies for mild/moderate MS, and provide real-life insights into currently applied therapeutic strategies.

methodsThis noninterventional, cross-sectional study (ML29913) at 50 sites in Germany included RRMS patients on therapies for mild/moderate MS who switched immunotherapy in the years 2014-2017. The key outcome variable was the reason to switch, as documented in the medical charts, based on failure of current therapy, cognitive decline, adverse events (AEs), patient wish, or a woman's wish to become pregnant. Expectations of the new DMT and patients' assessment of the decision maker were also recorded.

resultsThe core analysis population included 595 patients, with a mean age of 41.6 years, of which 69.7% were female. More than 60% of patients had at least one relapse within 12 months prior to the switch. The main reasons to switch DMT were failure of current therapy (53.9%), patient wish (22.4%), and AEs (19.0%). Most patients (54.3%) were switched within DMTs for mild/moderate MS; only 43.5% received a subsequent DMT for active/highly active MS. While clinical and outcome-oriented aspects were the most frequently mentioned expectations of the new DMT for physicians, aspects relating to quality of life played a major role for patients.

conclusionsOur data indicate suboptimal usage of DMTs, including monoclonal antibodies, for active/highly active MS in German patients. This illustrates the medical need for DMTs combining high efficacy, low safety risk, and low therapy burden.

Indexed as

disease modifying therapiesmultiple sclerosisreal-world datarelapsing-remitting multiple sclerosistreatment switch

Identifiers

PMID31903096
PMCPMC6923693
OpenAlexW2995747395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.