ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2019
Ten-Year Experience Outcomes of a Day Treatment for Children and Adolescents with Psychiatric Disorders.
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIt was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a day treatment clinic in Turkey and which has been serving for ten years for children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders.
methods262 patients who completed day treatment within ten years were tested at intake and discharge. The patients' functioning was assessed using the Children's Global Assesment Scale (CGAS), Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGIS), state-trait anxiety inventory for children, depression rating scale for children, Coopersmith self-esteem inventory for children. Pre/post treatment comparisons were made on same variables.
resultsStatistical analyses showed that, improvement was maintained on all measures. The high CGAS scores at discharge were showed well-being and good functioning of patients. The CGIS scores varied from moderately disturbed (4.83±0.88) to much improved (2.55±0.93) demonstrated that treatment responses showed improvement. Wilcoxon T tests showed that patients were significantly more anxious and depressive at intake and had more problems in self esteem. State-trait anxiety inventory for children and depression rating scale for children scores decreased and Coopersmith self-esteem inventory for children scores improved with day treatment.
conclusionThis study points that as results of ten-year experience, day treatment approach seems effective and therefore to be the treatment of choice for treating children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders. It also shows the necessity of a treatment that combines multiple modalities like day treatment and day treatment must be more generalize for these patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.