Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31902554›Full record

Trial reportJournal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2020

CT Densitometry and Morphology of Radiofrequency-Ablated Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4033 (Alliance) Trial.

Erica S Alexander, Lillian Xiong, Grayson L Baird, Hiran Fernando, Damian E Dupuy

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Predictive Value of Quantitative Parameters ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Interventional oncology update.European journal of radiology open · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Erica S AlexanderDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: Erica.s.alexander@gmail.com.
Lillian XiongDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Grayson L BairdDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Hiran FernandoDepartment of Surgery, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia.
Damian E DupuyCape Cod Hospital, Hyannis, Massachusetts.
Brown University · USCape Cod Hospital · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USVirginia Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate tumor and ablation zone morphology and densitometry related to tumor recurrence in participants with Stage IA non-small cell lung cancer undergoing radiofrequency ablation in a prospective, multicenter trial. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-five participants (median 76 years old; 25 women; 20 men) from 16 sites were followed for 2 years (December 2006 to November 2010) with computed tomography (CT) densitometry. Imaging findings before and after ablation were recorded, including maximum CT attenuation (in Hounsfield units) at precontrast and 45-, 90-, 180-, and 300-s postcontrast.

resultsEvery 1-cm increase in the largest axial diameter of the ablation zone at 3-months' follow-up compared to the index tumor reduced the odds of 2-year recurrence by 52% (P = .02). A 1-cm difference performed the best (sensitivity, 0.56; specificity, 0.93; positive likelihood ratio of 8). CT densitometry precontrast and at 45 seconds showed significantly different enhancement patterns in a comparison among pretreated lung cancer (delta = +61.2 HU), tumor recurrence (delta = +57 HU), and treated tumor/ablation zone (delta [change in attenuation] = +16.9 HU), (P < .0001). Densitometry from 45 to 300 s was also different among pretreated tumor (delta = -6.8 HU), recurrence (delta = -11.2 HU), and treated tumor (delta = +12.1 HU; P = .01). Untreated and residual tumor demonstrated washout, whereas treated tumor demonstrated increased attenuation.

conclusionsAn ablation zone ≥1 cm larger than the initial tumor, based on 3-month follow-up imaging, is recommended to decrease odds of recurrence. CT densitometry can delineate tumor versus treatment zones.

Indexed as

Radiofrequency AblationTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMargins of ExcisionNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31902554
PMCPMC6994385
OpenAlexW2996843666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.