Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31902517›Full record

ArticleBehaviour research and therapy2020

Use of role plays to assess therapist competency and its association with client outcomes in psychological interventions: A scoping review and competency research agenda.

Katherine E Ottman, Brandon A Kohrt, Gloria A Pedersen, Alison Schafer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Behaviour research and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05290142 (A Pre-and-post Study With a Nested Randomised Controlled Trial of Coach Versus Self-guided Digital Training in a Youth-focused Problem-solving Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05290142 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Pre-and-post Study With a Nested Randomised Controlled Trial of Coach Versus Self-guided Digital Training in a Youth-focused Problem-solving Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorSangathRan2022 to 2022Enrolled277ConditionsDepression, AnxietyArmsDigital Training with Coaching (DT-C), Self-Guided Digital Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fine-tuning Postgraduate Psychiatry Training in South Asia.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine E OttmanDivision of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University, 2120 L St NW, Suite 600, Washington, D.C, 20037, USA.
Brandon A KohrtDivision of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University, 2120 L St NW, Suite 600, Washington, D.C, 20037, USA. Electronic address: bkohrt@gwu.edu.
Gloria A PedersenDivision of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University, 2120 L St NW, Suite 600, Washington, D.C, 20037, USA.
Alison SchaferWorld Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva 27, 1211, Switzerland.
George Washington University · USWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Reducing Barriers to Mental Health Task SharingK01MH104310 · NIMH · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KOHRT, BRANDON ALAN · 2014 to 2018
$908k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH104310World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge in scaling-up psychological interventions worldwide is how to evaluate competency among new workforces engaged in psychological services. One approach to measuring competency is through standardized role plays. Role plays have the benefits of standardization and reliance on observed behavior rather than written knowledge. However, role plays are also resource intensive and dependent upon inter-rater reliability. We undertook a two-part scoping review to describe how competency is conceptualized in studies evaluating the relationship of competency with client outcomes. We focused on use of role plays including achieving inter-rater reliability and the association with client outcomes. First, we identified 4 reviews encompassing 61 studies evaluating the association of competency with client outcomes. Second, we identified 39 competency evaluation tools, of which 21 were used in comparisons with client outcomes. Inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) was reported for 15 tools and ranged from 0.53 to 0.96 (mean ICC = 0.77). However, we found that none of the outcome comparison studies measured competency with standardized role plays. Instead, studies typically used therapy quality (i.e., session ratings with actual clients) as a proxy for competency. This reveals a gap in the evidence base for competency and its role in predicting client outcomes. We therefore propose a competency research agenda to develop an evidence-base for objective, standardized role plays to measure competency and its association with client outcomes. OPEN SCIENCE REGISTRATION #: https://osf.io/nqhu7/.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePatient SimulationRole PlayingAllied Health PersonnelCognitive Behavioral TherapyEducational MeasurementHumansMental DisordersMotivational InterviewingProblem SolvingPsychosocial InterventionPsychotherapistsQuality of Health CareTreatment OutcomeCommon mental disordersCompetenceDeveloping countriesParaprofessionalsPsychological treatmentsTraining

Identifiers

PMID31902517
PMCPMC7293551
OpenAlexW2996434546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.