Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31902031›Full record

ReviewClinical rheumatology2020

Psychological safety, the hidden curriculum, and ambiguity in medicine.

Karina D Torralba, Donna Jose, John Byrne

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives: A qualitative study on community health clinic team member perspectives.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. When I say …. Respectful curiosity.Medical education · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karina D TorralbaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11234 Anderson St, MC 1519, Loma Linda, CA, 92373, USA. ktorralba@llu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4741-1213
Donna JoseDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11234 Anderson St, MC 1519, Loma Linda, CA, 92373, USA.
John ByrneDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11234 Anderson St, MC 1519, Loma Linda, CA, 92373, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological safety is a feeling that individuals are comfortable expressing and being themselves, as well as comfortable sharing concerns and mistakes without fear of embarrassment, shame, ridicule, or retribution. It has long been recognized as part of successful patient safety and quality improvement processes. However, in the realm of medical education, psychological safety is a relatively unknown concept to many educators and learners alike. Learners, whether students or postgraduate trainees, are in a phase of cognitive apprenticeship whereby they learn not only skills and knowledge from teachers as part of an explicit and formal curriculum. At the same time, a hidden curriculum is also part of the learning environment in the form of norms, values, and behaviors exhibited by teachers. These norms, values, and behaviors become part of the culture of the clinical learning environment. The vulnerability of learners in this environment is magnified by the hierarchal nature of medicine, and the complexity, uncertainty, and the ambiguity inherent to medical conditions. This is especially true of cognitive specialties such as rheumatology. Educators who engage in unprofessional behaviors that result in learner humiliation and shame may serve to dampen productive discourse and scientific dialog. Therefore, educators must embrace psychological safety to foster learning and facilitate high-performing teams in the clinical learning environment.Key Points• Psychological safety improves communication and teamwork by allowing individuals to be comfortable expressing and being themselves, as well as comfortable sharing concerns and mistakes without fear of embarrassment, shame, ridicule, or retribution.• Commonly studied in the context of patient safety and quality improvement, psychological safety should extend towards medical education particularly in the context of allowing medical students and postgraduate trainees to be able to voice clinical reasoning in the face of ambiguity.• Educators take on a leadership role when having learners under their supervision; as leaders, educators are the prime movers of psychological safety• Learners in the process of developing their self-identity in the context of their chosen profession adopt not only knowledge and skills within the framework of an explicit and formal curriculum but also norms and values from daily behavior and language educators present in the clinical learning environment of learners; these norms and values are collectively part of the hidden curriculum.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCurriculumEducation, MedicalClinical CompetenceCognitionHumansModels, EducationalOrganizational CultureStudents, MedicalAmbiguityCognitive apprenticeshipHidden curriculumMedical educationPsychological safety

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.