Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31901781›Full record

ReviewTranslational oncology2020

Homologous Recombination Repair Deficiency and the Immune Response in Breast Cancer: A Literature Review.

B Pellegrino, A Musolino, A Llop-Guevara, V Serra, P De Silva, Z Hlavata, D Sangiolo, K Willard-Gallo, C Solinas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current and future immunotherapy for breast cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

B PellegrinoMedical Oncology and Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy. Electronic address: benedettapellegrino89@gmail.com.
A MusolinoMedical Oncology and Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
A Llop-GuevaraExperimental Therapeutics Group, Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
V SerraExperimental Therapeutics Group, Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
P De SilvaMolecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet and Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Z HlavataMedical Oncology Department, CHR Mons-Hainaut, Mons, Belgium.
D SangioloDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy; Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.
K Willard-GalloMolecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet and Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
C SolinasMolecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet and Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium; Regional Hospital of Valle D'Aosta, Aosta, Italy. Electronic address: czsolinas@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has demonstrated the importance of targeting a preexisting immune response in a broad spectrum of tumors. This is particularly novel and relevant for less immunogenic tumors, such as breast cancer (BC), where the efficacy of ICB was more evident in the triple-negative (TNBC) subtype, in earlier stages, and in association with chemotherapy. Tumors harboring homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR) deficiency (HRD) are supposed to have a higher number of mutations, hence a higher tumor mutational burden, which could potentially make them more sensitive to immunotherapy. However, the mechanisms involved in ICB sensitivity and patient selection are still yet to be defined in BC: whether the innate system could play a role and how the adaptive immunity could be linked with HRR pathways are the two key points of debate that we will discuss in this article. The aim of this review was to close the loop between what was found in clinical trial results so far, go back to laboratory theory and preclinical results and point out what needs to be clarified from now on.

Identifiers

PMID31901781
PMCPMC6948367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.