Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31901440›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology2020

The 111 Study: A Single-arm, Phase 3 Trial Evaluating One Cycle of Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-risk, Stage 1 Nonseminomatous or Combined Germ Cell Tumours of the Testis.

Michael Cullen, Robert Huddart, Johnathan Joffe, Deborah Gardiner, Lauren Maynard, Paul Hutton, Danish Mazhar, Jonathan Shamash, Matthew Wheater, Jeff White and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01726374 (A Single Group Trial Evaluating One Cycle of Adjuvant BEP Chemotherapy in High Risk, Stage 1 Non-seminomatous Germ Cell Tumours of the Testis), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01726374 phase3completednot on this map

A Single Group Trial Evaluating One Cycle of Adjuvant BEP Chemotherapy in High Risk, Stage 1 Non-seminomatous Germ Cell Tumours of the Testis (NSGCTT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute of Cancer Research, United KingdomRan2010 to 2024Enrolled246ConditionsStage I Testicular Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell TumorArmsBEP(500)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SEOM-GG clinical guidelines for the management of germ-cell testicular cancer (2023).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Role of Epigenetics for the Efficacy of Cisplatin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetic Factors and ncRNAs in Testicular Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Canadian Urological Association consensus guideline: Management of testicular germ cell cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Controversies in the management of clinical stage 1 testis cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  19. Approach to chemotherapy for high-risk, stage 1, non-seminomatous, germ cell testicular tumors.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Michael CullenUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Robert HuddartThe Institute Of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: robert.huddart@icr.ac.uk.
Johnathan JoffeThe Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Deborah GardinerClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Lauren MaynardClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Paul HuttonUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Danish MazharCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Jonathan ShamashBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Matthew WheaterUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Jeff WhiteBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Aicha GoubarClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Nuria PortaClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Stephanie WittsClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Rebecca LewisClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Emma HallClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
111 Trial Management Group
Institute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25351Cancer Research UK 9949Cancer Research UK C1491/A15955Cancer Research UK CRUK/09/011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard management in the UK for high-risk stage 1 nonseminoma germ cell tumours of the testis (NSGCTT) is two cycles of adjuvant bleomycin, etoposide (360 mg/m

objectiveTo test whether one cycle of BE DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA total of 246 patients with vascular invasion-positive stage 1 NSGCTT or combined seminoma + NSGCTT were centrally registered in a single-arm prospective study.

interventionOne cycle comprising bleomycin 30000 IU on days 1, 8, and 15, etoposide 165 mg/m OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was 2-yr malignant recurrence (MR); the aim was to exclude a rate of ≥5%. Participants had regular imaging and tumour marker (TM) assessment for 5 yr. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up was 49 mo (interquartile range 37-60). Ten patients with rising TMs at baseline were excluded. Four patients had MR at 6, 7, 13, and 27 mo; all received second-line chemotherapy and surgery and three remained recurrence-free at 5 yr. The 2-yr MR rate was 1.3% (95% confidence interval 0.3-3.7%). Three patients developed nonmalignant recurrences with localised teratoma differentiated, rendered disease-free after surgery. Grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 6.8% of participants.

conclusionsBE PATIENT SUMMARY: Removing the testicle fails to cure many patients with high-risk primary testicular cancer since undetectable cancers are often present elsewhere. A standard additional treatment in Europe is two cycles of chemotherapy to eradicate these. This trial shows one cycle has few adverse effects and comparable outcomes to those seen with two cycles.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic AgentsBleomycinChemotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinDrug Therapy, CombinationEtoposideHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentAntineoplastic AgentsBleomycinCisplatinEtoposideAdjuvant therapyBEPChemotherapyNSGCTTPhase III trialSurveillanceTesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID31901440
PMCPMC7026695
OpenAlexW2995820724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.